Research

The role of transposon activity in shaping cis-regulatory element evolution after whole-genome duplication

    • 1Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway;
    • 2Aquaculture Programme, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia;
    • 3School of Biological Sciences–Organisms and the Environment, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TU Norwich, United Kingdom;
    • 4Department of Organismal Biology–Systematic Biology (EBC), Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden;
    • 5Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway
    • 6 These authors contributed equally to this work.
    • 7 Present address: Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
Published February 12, 2025. Vol 35 Issue 3, pp. 475-488. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.278931.124
Download PDF Please log-in to or register for your personal account in order to access PDF Cite Article Permissions Share
cover of Genome Research Vol 36 Issue 4
Current Issue:

Abstract

Whole-genome duplications (WGDs) and transposable element (TE) activity can act synergistically in genome evolution. WGDs can increase TE activity directly through cellular stress or indirectly by relaxing selection against TE insertions in functionally redundant, duplicated regions. Because TEs can function as, or evolve into, TE-derived cis-regulatory elements (TE-CREs), bursts of TE activity following WGD are therefore likely to impact evolution of gene regulation. Yet, the role of TEs in genome regulatory evolution after WGDs is not well understood. Here we used Atlantic salmon as a model system to explore how TE activity after the salmonid WGD ∼100 MYA shaped CRE evolution. We identified 55,080 putative TE-CREs using chromatin accessibility data from the liver and brain. Retroelements were both the dominant source of TE-CREs and had higher regulatory activity in MPRA experiments compared with DNA elements. A minority of TE subfamilies (16%) accounted for 46% of TE-CREs, but these “CRE superspreaders” were mostly active prior to the WGD. Analysis of individual TE insertions, however, revealed enrichment of TE-CREs originating from WGD-associated TE activity, particularly for the DTT (Tc1-Mariner) DNA elements. Furthermore, coexpression analyses supported the presence of TE-driven gene regulatory network evolution, including DTT elements active at the time of WGD. In conclusion, our study supports a scenario in which TE activity has been important in genome regulatory evolution, either through relaxed selective constraints or through strong selection to recalibrate optimal gene expression phenotypes, during a transient period following genome doubling.

Loading
Loading
Back to top