Index by Author

September 2021; 31 (9)
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z

A

  1. Andersen, Erik C.

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

  2. Anderson, James T.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

B

  1. Baer, Charles F.

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

  2. Basu, Uttiya

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  3. Beer, Michael A.

  4. Bernier, Raphael

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  5. Biswas, Anushua

  6. Blanda, Thomas R.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  7. Bocklund, Kylie

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  8. Bulyk, Martha L.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

C

  1. Carrel, Laura

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  2. Chakravarti, Aravinda

  3. Chen, Fang

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  4. Cheng, Luyao

  5. Coudray, Alexandre

    • Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1531-1545; Published in Advance August 16, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275133.120
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  6. Crombie, Timothy A.

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

D

  1. Dai, Shanjun

  2. Dind, Sagane

    • Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1531-1545; Published in Advance August 16, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275133.120
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  3. Douglas, William

  4. Duc, Julien

    • Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1531-1545; Published in Advance August 16, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275133.120
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  5. Dweikat, Sarah N.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

E

  1. Edwards, Keith J.

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  2. Eichler, Evan E.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  3. Englebright, Marisa

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  4. Ettensohn, Charles A.

F

  1. Fang, Pingping

  2. Franklin, F. Chris H.

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  3. Fudenberg, Geoff

    • Genome-wide variability in recombination activity is associated with meiotic chromatin organization Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1561-1572; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275358.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  4. Furlong, Eileen E.M.

    • The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1573-1581; Published in Advance July 15, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275212.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

G

  1. Gilissen, Christian

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  2. Girardot, Charles

    • The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1573-1581; Published in Advance July 15, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275212.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  3. Goldmann, Jakob M.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  4. Guerrero-Santoro, Jennifer

H

  1. Hampstead, Juliet E.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  2. Henderson, Ian R.

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  3. Higgins, James D.

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  4. Holland, Daniel M.

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  5. Hsueh, Aaron J.

  6. Huang, Beili

  7. Huang, Jian

  8. Huynen, Martijn A.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

J

  1. James, Daniela

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  2. James, Jesica

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  3. Jiang, Wei

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  4. Jin, Haixia

  5. Jin, Xiaofan

    • Genome-wide variability in recombination activity is associated with meiotic chromatin organization Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1561-1572; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275358.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  6. Johnson, Lindsay M.

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

  7. Jonker, Marianne A.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  8. Joyner-Matos, Joanna

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

K

  1. Kapoor, Ashish

  2. Keogh, Michael-C.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  3. Khor, Jian Ming

  4. Khoueiry, Pierre

    • The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1573-1581; Published in Advance July 15, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275212.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  5. Kuntala, Prashant K.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

L

  1. Lai, William K.M.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  2. Lee, Changhee

  3. Lee, Dongwon

  4. Li, Conghui

  5. Li, Qiuzi

  6. Liang, Kaiwei

  7. Liu, Dajiang J.

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  8. Liu, Jialin

    • The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1573-1581; Published in Advance July 15, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275212.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

M

  1. Ma, Xueshan

  2. Mairose, Joshua

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  3. Mariani, Luca

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  4. Maxwell, George L.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  5. McAnarney, Eileen

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  6. Mistretta, Katelyn

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  7. Mudgett, Michael

N

  1. Narlikar, Leelavati

  2. Niu, Wenbin

  3. Novitzky, Katherine

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

O

  1. Osman, Kim

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

P

  1. Pfenninger, Markus

  2. Phanor, Sabrina K.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  3. Planet, Evarist

    • Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1531-1545; Published in Advance August 16, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275133.120
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  4. Playfoot, Christopher J.

    • Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1531-1545; Published in Advance August 16, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275133.120
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  5. Pollard, Katherine S.

    • Genome-wide variability in recombination activity is associated with meiotic chromatin organization Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1561-1572; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275358.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  6. Pugh, B. Franklin

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

R

  1. Rajaei, Moein

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

  2. Reddington, James P.

    • The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1573-1581; Published in Advance July 15, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275212.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  3. Robinson-Rechavi, Marc

    • The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1573-1581; Published in Advance July 15, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275212.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  4. Rödelsperger, Christian

    • Single worm transcriptomics identifies a developmental core network of oscillating genes with deep conservation across nematodes Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1590-1601; Published in Advance July 22, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275303.121

  5. Rossi, Matthew J.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  6. Rothschild, Gerson

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

S

  1. Sanchez-Moran, Eugenio

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  2. Sauteraud, Renan

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  3. Saxena, Ayush Shekhar

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

  4. Shah, Avani P.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  5. Sheppard, Shaoline

    • Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1531-1545; Published in Advance August 16, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275133.120
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  6. Shi, Senlin

  7. Shilatifard, Ali

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  8. Shu, Yimin

  9. Smith, Edwin R.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  10. Snyder, Michael C.

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

  11. Sommer, Ralf J.

    • Single worm transcriptomics identifies a developmental core network of oscillating genes with deep conservation across nematodes Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1590-1601; Published in Advance July 22, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275303.121

  12. Song, Wenyan

  13. Stahl, Jill M.

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  14. Sun, Shuai

    • Single worm transcriptomics identifies a developmental core network of oscillating genes with deep conservation across nematodes Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1590-1601; Published in Advance July 22, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275303.121

  15. Sun, Yingpu

T

  1. Tanny, Robyn E.

    • Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1602-1613; Published in Advance August 17, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275372.121

  2. Tock, Andrew J.

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

  3. Trono, Didier

    • Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1531-1545; Published in Advance August 16, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275133.120
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

  4. Turner, Tychele N.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

U

  1. Uauy, Cristobal

    • Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1614-1628; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.273672.120

V

  1. Veltman, Joris A.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  2. Venters, Bryan J.

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  3. Viales, Rebecca R.

    • The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1573-1581; Published in Advance July 15, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275212.121
      OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

W

  1. Waldvogel, Ann-Marie

  2. Wang, Honghong

  3. Wang, Wen

  4. Wang, Yang

  5. Wilfert, Amy B.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

  6. Wong, Wendy S.W.

    • Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals are due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1513-1518; Published in Advance July 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.271809.120

X

  1. Xiang, Ying

  2. Xiao, Ruijing

  3. Xie, Wei

  4. Xu, Jiawei

Y

  1. Yao, Guidong

  2. Yin, Zhinang

Z

  1. Zhan, Xiaowei

    • Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1629-1637; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275677.121

  2. Zhang, Fuli

  3. Zhang, Wanwei

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

  4. Zhang, Xiangyang

  5. Zhang, Yile

  6. Zhang, Yu

  7. Zhao, Zibo

    • A ChIP-exo screen of 887 Protein Capture Reagents Program transcription factor antibodies in human cells Genome Res. September 2021 31: 1663-1679; Published in Advance August 23, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275472.121

Current Issue

  1. January 2026, 36 (1)
  1. Current Issue
  1. Alert me to new issues of Genome Research