Transcriptional fates of human-specific segmental duplications in brain

    • 1Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
    • 2Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) of California, Incorporated, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA;
    • 3Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA;
    • 4Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA;
    • 5Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA;
    • 6Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
    • 7 These authors contributed equally to this work.
Published September 18, 2018. Vol 28 Issue 10, pp. 1566-1576. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.237610.118
Download PDF Please log-in to or register for your personal account in order to access PDF Cite Article Permissions Share
cover of Genome Research Vol 36 Issue 5
Current Issue:

Abstract

Despite the importance of duplicate genes for evolutionary adaptation, accurate gene annotation is often incomplete, incorrect, or lacking in regions of segmental duplication. We developed an approach combining long-read sequencing and hybridization capture to yield full-length transcript information and confidently distinguish between nearly identical genes/paralogs. We used biotinylated probes to enrich for full-length cDNA from duplicated regions, which were then amplified, size-fractionated, and sequenced using single-molecule, long-read sequencing technology, permitting us to distinguish between highly identical genes by virtue of multiple paralogous sequence variants. We examined 19 gene families as expressed in developing and adult human brain, selected for their high sequence identity (average >99%) and overlap with human-specific segmental duplications (SDs). We characterized the transcriptional differences between related paralogs to better understand the birth–death process of duplicate genes and particularly how the process leads to gene innovation. In 48% of the cases, we find that the expressed duplicates have changed substantially from their ancestral models due to novel sites of transcription initiation, splicing, and polyadenylation, as well as fusion transcripts that connect duplication-derived exons with neighboring genes. We detect unannotated open reading frames in genes currently annotated as pseudogenes, while relegating other duplicates to nonfunctional status. Our method significantly improves gene annotation, specifically defining full-length transcripts, isoforms, and open reading frames for new genes in highly identical SDs. The approach will be more broadly applicable to genes in structurally complex regions of other genomes where the duplication process creates novel genes important for adaptive traits.

Loading
Loading
Back to top