ARTICLE

Copy number variation and evolution in humans and chimpanzees

    • 1 School of Human Evolution & Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA;
    • 2 Department of Pathology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
    • 3 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom;
    • 4 Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
    • 5 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
    • 6 These authors contributed equally to this work.
    • 7 Corresponding author. E-mail [email protected]; fax +44-1223-494919.
Published September 4, 2008. Vol 18 Issue 11, pp. 1698-1710. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.082016.108
Download PDF Please log-in to or register for your personal account in order to access PDF Cite Article Permissions Share
cover of Genome Research Vol 36 Issue 4
Current Issue:

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) underlie many aspects of human phenotypic diversity and provide the raw material for gene duplication and gene family expansion. However, our understanding of their evolutionary significance remains limited. We performed comparative genomic hybridization on a single human microarray platform to identify CNVs among the genomes of 30 humans and 30 chimpanzees as well as fixed copy number differences between species. We found that human and chimpanzee CNVs occur in orthologous genomic regions far more often than expected by chance and are strongly associated with the presence of highly homologous intrachromosomal segmental duplications. By adapting population genetic analyses for use with copy number data, we identified functional categories of genes that have likely evolved under purifying or positive selection for copy number changes. In particular, duplications and deletions of genes with inflammatory response and cell proliferation functions may have been fixed by positive selection and involved in the adaptive phenotypic differentiation of humans and chimpanzees.

Loading
Loading
Back to top