Research

Noncanonical secondary structures arising from non-B DNA motifs are determinants of mutagenesis

    • 1Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, United Kingdom;
    • 2Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;
    • 3East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
Published August 13, 2018. Vol 28 Issue 9, pp. 1264-1271. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.231688.117
Download PDF Please log-in to or register for your personal account in order to access PDF Cite Article Permissions Share
cover of Genome Research Vol 36 Issue 4
Current Issue:

Abstract

Somatic mutations show variation in density across cancer genomes. Previous studies have shown that chromatin organization and replication time domains are correlated with, and thus predictive of, this variation. Here, we analyze 1809 whole-genome sequences from 10 cancer types to show that a subset of repetitive DNA sequences, called non-B motifs that predict noncanonical secondary structure formation can independently account for variation in mutation density. Combined with epigenetic factors and replication timing, the variance explained can be improved to 43%–76%. Approximately twofold mutation enrichment is observed directly within non-B motifs, is focused on exposed structural components, and is dependent on physical properties that are optimal for secondary structure formation. Therefore, there is mounting evidence that secondary structures arising from non-B motifs are not simply associated with increased mutation density—they are possibly causally implicated. Our results suggest that they are determinants of mutagenesis and increase the likelihood of recurrent mutations in the genome. This analysis calls for caution in the interpretation of recurrent mutations and highlights the importance of taking non-B motifs that can simply be inferred from the reference sequence into consideration in background models of mutability henceforth.

Loading
Loading
Back to top