Methods

Eukaryotic Regulatory Element Conservation Analysis and Identification Using Comparative Genomics

    • 1 Stanford Medical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
    • 2 Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
    • 3 Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
    • 4 Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
    • 5 Nexus Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA
Published March 1, 2004. Vol 14 Issue 3, pp. 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1327604
Download PDF Please log-in to or register for your personal account in order to access PDF Cite Article Permissions Share
cover of Genome Research Vol 36 Issue 4
Current Issue:

Abstract

Comparative genomics is a promising approach to the challenging problem of eukaryotic regulatory element identification, because functional noncoding sequences may be conserved across species from evolutionary constraints. We systematically analyzed known human and Saccharomyces cerevisiae regulatory elements and discovered that human regulatory elements are more conserved between human and mouse than are background sequences. Although S. cerevisiae regulatory elements do not appear to be more conserved by comparison of S. cerevisiae to Schizosaccharomyces pombe, they are more conserved when compared with multiple other yeast genomes (Saccharomyces paradoxus, Saccharomyces mikatae, and Saccharomyces bayanus). Based on these analyses, we developed a sequence-motif-finding algorithm called CompareProspector, which extends Gibbs sampling by biasing the search in regions conserved across species. Using human–mouse comparison, CompareProspector identified known motifs for transcription factors Mef2, Myf, Srf, and Sp1 from a set of human-muscle-specific genes. It also discovered the NFAT motif from genes up-regulated by CD28 stimulation in T-cells, which implies the direct involvement of NFAT in mediating the CD28 stimulatory signal. Using Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis briggsae comparison, CompareProspector found the PHA-4 motif and the UNC-86 motif. CompareProspector outperformed many other computational motif-finding programs, demonstrating the power of comparative genomics-based biased sampling in eukaryotic regulatory element identification.

Loading
Loading
Back to top