LETTER

Conserved Noncoding Sequences in the Grasses4

    • 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
    • 2 College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
    • 3 Torrey Mesa Research Institute, Syngenta Corporation, San Diego, California, USA
Published September 2, 2003. Vol 13 Issue 9, pp. 2030-2041. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1280703
Download PDF Please log-in to or register for your personal account in order to access PDF Cite Article Permissions Share
cover of Genome Research Vol 36 Issue 4
Current Issue:

Abstract

As orthologous genes from related species diverge over time, some sequences are conserved in noncoding regions. In mammals, large phylogenetic footprints, or conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs), are known to be common features of genes. Here we present the first large-scale analysis of plant genes for CNSs. We used maize and rice, maximally diverged members of the grass family of monocots. Using a local sequence alignment set to deliver only significant alignments, we found one or more CNSs in the noncoding regions of the majority of genes studied. Grass genes have dramatically fewer and much smaller CNSs than mammalian genes. Twenty-seven percent of grass gene comparisons revealed no CNSs. Genes functioning in upstream regulatory roles, such as transcription factors, are greatly enriched for CNSs relative to genes encoding enzymes or structural proteins. Further, we show that a CNS cluster in an intron of the knotted1 homeobox gene serves as a site of negative regulation. We showthat CNSs in the adh1 gene do not correlate with known cis-acting sites. We discuss the potential meanings of CNSs and their value as analytical tools and evolutionary characters. We advance the idea that many CNSs function to lock-in gene regulatory decisions.

Loading
Loading
Back to top