Comparative analysis of TR characterization. Four tools are tested in the analysis, MotifScope, TRF, uTR, and vamos. For vamos, here we use both the original motif set (vamos original) and the efficient motif set (vamos efficient). (A) The number of motifs discovered by each of the four tools. (B) The edit distance between the actual sequence and the results obtained from the four tools, normalized with respect to repeat length. (D,E) The intersection of motifs between MotifScope and other tools (dots connected by lines below the X-axis): in the bar plot, each column shows the results obtained from both MotifScope and the respective other tools (Method X) for all 5486 loci; for D, the stacked bar plot shows the fraction of intersected motifs over the total number of motifs found by the other tool for each loci, as shown in C, A / Method X, and the segments in the bar denote the distribution of the ratio among all these loci; for E the stacked bar plot shows the fraction of intersected motifs over the total number of motifs found by MotifScope, as shown in C, A / MotifScope, and the segments in the bar denote the distribution of the ratio among all these loci.
