Ultraviolet damage and repair maps in Drosophila reveal the impact of domain-specific changes in nucleosome repeat length on repair efficiency

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Translational CPD repair periods and nucleosome repeat length vary in tandem across chromatin types. (A,B) Lomb–Scargle periodograms showing nucleosome occupancy (A) and CPD repair (B) periodicities for each chromatin type. Black trend lines represent repressive chromatin; blue trend lines, PcG heterochromatin, green trend lines, centromeric chromatin; red trend lines, inducible euchromatin; and yellow trend lines, constitutive euchromatin. (C,D) Overlaid constitutive euchromatin and repressive chromatin translational patterns for nucleosome occupancy (C) and CPD repair activity (30 min; D). Nucleosome dyads were never called within 147 bp of one another, so the region from −147 to 147 bp in the nucleosome occupancy data (C) was excluded from the periodicity analysis.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 35: 257-267

Preprint Server