Haplotype-resolved 3D chromatin architecture of the hybrid pig

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Influence of allelic sequence variations on PEIs. (A,B) Promoters (A) and enhancers (B), with higher allelic sequence divergence (especially those with the lowest 1% of IDS between parental breeds) (see Supplemental Methods), showed greater differences in PEI intensity. P-values are from a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (C) Effects on PEI intensity caused by allelic variation-induced differences in PEI bridging distances. PEIs with the top 1% of increases in bridging distance showed significantly decreased PEI intensity (0%–99% vs. 99%–100%: P = 5.03 × 10–12 in liver, P = 2.21 × 10–6 in muscle, and P = 3.26 × 10–10 in brain; Wilcoxon rank-sum test; left). This trend is more prominent in PEIs with the greatest extension (allelic fold change in linear bridging distance of the top 0.1%: 1.17–1.21), which showed strongly negative correlations between bridging distance and PEI intensity of PEIs (Spearman's r = –0.15 to –0.29, P ≤ 0.0036; right). (D) PEIs with enrichment for differential allelic intensity (x-axis) among genes that contact a variable number of enhancers (y-axis) in the three tissues. (E) PEIs showing greater differential allelic intensity tend to contribute less to RPS (including the combined regulatory effects of multiple enhancers for a given gene) and thus exert the least impact on gene expression. P-values are from a paired Student's t-test. Hi-C maps at 5-kb resolution were used to generate these graphs.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 34: 310-325

Preprint Server