Binding profiles for 961 Drosophila and C. elegans transcription factors reveal tissue-specific regulatory relationships

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Peaks and metapeaks. (A,B) Number of peaks per experiment (A) for the worm and (B) for the fly. Vertical lines denote the median number of peaks in worm (1130) and fly (4416). (C,D) The total number of peaks in metapeaks declines rapidly with increasing metapeak occupancy (the number of peaks in an individual metapeak) in both worm (C) and fly (D). The vertical bars indicate the thresholds used to define HOT (left) and ultra-HOT (right) sites in each species (84 and 240 peaks, respectively, in the worm and 277 and 602 peaks in the fly). (E,F) In worm (E) and fly (F), the relative rank of the signal strength of peaks within metapeaks increases with metapeak occupancy. (G,H) Both worm (G) and fly (H) targets of high-occupancy metapeaks show a predominance of high entropy genes (more uniform expression), while targets with lower occupancy metapeaks show lower entropy, indicating more cell-type-specific expression. The entropy of fly genes is shifted higher in the fly than in the worm.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 34: 2319-2334

Preprint Server