Systematic evaluation of the effect of polyadenylation signal variants on the expression of disease-associated genes

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Comparison between our method and polyApredictor for evaluating the effect of PAS variants on RNA-level gene expression. (A) Box plot of predicted expression changes between database-annotated pathogenic (left) and benign (right) variants in the PAS using polyApredictor. Abs (alt-ref) denotes absolute value reported by polyApredictor when comparing mutated to reference sequence of the PAS. (B) Scatterplot for evaluating the correlation of the analytic results reported between mpCHECK2 and polyApredictor. x-axis denotes the difference value (reported by polyApredictor) between mutated and reference base inside PASs. y-axis denotes the degree of normalized luciferase activity changes (reported by mpCHECK2) between mutated and reference base inside PASs. Each dot denotes a PAS variant. Red and black dots denote pathogenic and benign variants in PASs, respectively. Blue line shows the fitting of linear regression trend, and gray region denotes 95% confidence interval (CI). Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.84) is shown on the top left.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 31: 890-899

Preprint Server