Polygenic cis-regulatory adaptation in the evolution of yeast pathogenicity

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Fitness of reciprocal hemizygous (RH) strains. (A) Fitness in vivo. RH strains and the wild-type Y/S hybrid were competed for 5 d in immunocompromised mice. Twenty out of 21 strains with fitness values significantly different from the wild type were fitter than the wild type (P = 10−5), despite showing no measurable growth differences at 30°C in vitro (Supplemental Figs. 1, 2). All but the two SLA2 RH strains differ significantly from the wild type. Error bars, ±1 SE. (B) High-temperature (37°C) growth in vitro predicts fitness in vivo. Each strain's relative fitness rank is plotted both in vivo and in vitro; a significant (P = 0.002) correlation is observed. (C) Fitness in vitro. Y-alleles yield higher fitness than S-alleles at 37°C in vitro for 11 of 11 RH strain pairs. Genes are ordered by decreasing significance of the Y-allele advantage. Error bars, ±1 SE.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 22: 1930-1939

Preprint Server