Polymorphisms and the Differential Antiviral Activity of the Chicken Mx Gene

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

(A) The expression of Mx mRNA in each clone. Total RNA from transfected 3T3 cells was reverse transcribed and PCR amplified using Mx primers (top) and β-actin primers (bottom). 3T3, parental 3T3 cells; pCI (a1–3), control 3T3-pCI-neo; KS (b1–3), 3T3 cells expressing KS MxmRNA; NG (c1–4), 3T3 cells expressing NG Mx mRNA; KJ-2 (d1–3), 3T3 cells expressing KJ-2 Mx mRNA; HN (e1–4), 3T3 cells expressing HN Mx mRNA; WLK-2 (f1–3), 3T3 cells expressing WLK-2 Mx mRNA; SM-2 (g1–4), 3T3 cells expressing SM-2 Mx mRNA; and SHK (h1–3; h4 failed to express theMx mRNA), 3T3 cells expressing SHK Mx mRNA. An aliquot of each PCR product was electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. (B) The infectivity of VSVΔG*-G in Mx cDNA-transfected cell lines. The infectivity on parental 3T3 cells is expressed as 100%. Shown are mean value ± standard errors of the means (n = 10). Significance levels atP < .01 (**) compared with 3T3 cells are indicated.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 12: 595-601

Preprint Server