Searching journal content for articles similar to Sadhuka et al. 33 (7): 1101.

Displaying results 1-10 of 5755
For checked items
  1. ...modeling choices in scPSS, such as using PCA and Euclidean distance, were deliberate. In the absence of clearly labeled diseased cells, attempting to learn more complex embedding or distance functions risks overfitting to irrelevant patterns and failing to identify true disease states. The simplicity of sc...
  2. .... Striking a balance requires clear reidentification and inference risk quantification, relative to the proposed benefit of data release. In response to this, we provide a computational tool that assesses the degree to which a set of released SNPs could lead to genotypic and phenotypic inferences, using...
  3. ...between tumor and normal cells. In the assessment with bulk data, we surrogated the e as the TPM ratio between tumor and tissue-matched normal controls adjusted for CNAs to evaluate differential expression (Methods) (Fig. 3C). Consistent with our model, ewas higher for genes carrying elevated AEV indels...
  4. ...with SRS, need for customized pipelines, rapidly updating software, and incipient scalability continue to present challenges for adopting ONT in standard clinical practice. Here we assess the performance of ONT (R9 and R10 chemistries) in comparison to Illumina and MGI across 17 well...
  5. ...), but direct biochemical assessment of each variant in every relevant cell type and state remains impractical.An alternative approach is to train machine learning models on reference genomic sequence and then apply them to genetic variation data. Recent machine learning models including gkmSVM (Lee et al. 2015...
  6. ...), and more recently, (spatial) single-cell sequencing approaches (Moncada et al. 2020; Ma and Zhou 2022). Recent advances in organoid models represent a transformative development in cancer research. Organoids, cultured in vitro, retain self-renewal and self-organizing capabilities that mimic the structure...
  7. ...'s performance across different spatial transcriptomic platforms and data sets.Metrics for benchmarking performanceTo quantitatively evaluate the performance of spatial reconstruction, we employed the following metrics, each assessing a specific aspect of accuracy or similarity between the true and predicted...
  8. ...sensitivity of these effects to the genetic background, explaining why these effects are not evolutionarily conserved. Together, our results suggest that most transcriptomic and proteomic effects of gene deletion do not inform selected-effect function. This finding has important implications for assessing and...
  9. ...C, hm5C, ac4C, Ψ, m1Ψ, and m5U) and the three RNA basecalling models benchmarked (default, IVT, and SUP). To assess the performance of tested RNA basecalling models, error signatures (mismatch, deletion, and insertion frequency) were used. (B) Comparison of basecalling accuracies obtained from each...
  10. ...equally to this work. Corresponding author: pdrineas@purdue.eduAbstractLinear mixed models (LMMs) have been widely used in -wide association studies to control for population stratification and cryptic relatedness. However, estimating LMM parameters is computationally expensive, necessitating large...
For checked items

Preprint Server