Searching journal content for articles similar to Pherson et al. 29 (4): 602.

Displaying results 1-10 of 27
For checked items
  1. ...cells to re-enter the cell cycle partially restores a youthful H3K27me3 landscape, suggesting that DNA replication may rejuvenate chromatin structure (Yang et al. 2023). However, even mitotically active somatic stem cells display age-related increases in Polycomb repression: Aged Drosophila intestinal...
  2. ...rDNA (Zellner et al. 2007), and a recent biochemical analysis showed that purifiedORC could bind toG4 RNA or DNA (Hoshina et al. 2013). In the Drosophila , ORC binding sites contain a central GC-rich region surrounded by AT-rich sequences (Vorobyeva et al. 2013). G-rich motifs/G4 may help...
  3. ...Center, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Corresponding authors: cgutierrez@cbm.csic.es, ubastolla@cbm.csic.esAbstractEukaryotic replication depends on thousands of DNA replication origins (ORIs). A major challenge is to learn ORI biology...
  4. ...of chromatin fragments based on their protein/DNA ratio and has been used to purify bulk chromatin (density: 1.42–1.39 g/cm3) from freeDNA (»1.69 g/cm3) or cross-linked proteins (»1.25 g/cm3) (Solomon et al. 1988). Specific chromatin regions, such as enhancers, transcribed exons, or active promoters, show low...
  5. ...animals were flash-frozen before isolation of nuclei, our results represent DNA supercoiling states arrested at the time of freezing.BP was used previously to visualize transcription-dependent supercoils in Drosophila polytene chromosomes (Matsumoto and Hirose 2004) via microscopy. BP was also used...
  6. ...) regulate the expression of my gene of interest (GOI) directly on its promoter. However, answering this is not straightforward. Genes exist within multilayered microenvironments of proximal and distal promoter–enhancer interactions, DNA accessibility, histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), and DNA...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  7. ...#2;15; Fig. 1B). CNC sites that occur within promoter regions (#2.5 kb from the annotated TSS), are highly enriched for RNAP2 binding compared with cohesin-bound promoters in general (Fisher’s exact test P < 10#2;15). These results are similar to those in Drosophila, where cohesin lacks a functional...
  8. ...of cell differentiation (Reddington et al. 2013; Smith and Meissner 2013). The site-specific locations of these DNA modifications have been linked to disease development through nucleosome positioning (Portela et al. 2013), transcription factor (TF) binding (Stadler et al. 2011), and differential gene...
  9. ...al. 2005; Potthoff and Olson 2007; Zdobnov et al. 2020), with highly conserved DNA-binding domains (Carlsson and Mahlapuu 2002; Chang et al. 2015).View larger version: In this window In a new window Figure 1. Profiling transcription factor (TF) binding in F1 embryos of Drosophila melanogaster. (A...
  10. ...conformation capture data. By reporting on all tools’ performance in classifying CTCF-cohesin anchored stripes, enhancer–promoter interacting stripes, and indeterminate stripes, we also demonstrate a thorough, integrated analysis to determine the output stripes’ quality. Our work provides a flexible...
For checked items

Preprint Server