Searching journal content for articles similar to Oomen et al. 29 (2): 236.

Displaying results 1-10 of 124
For checked items
  1. ...chromatin loops between convergent CTCF sites (van Ruiten and Rowland 2021). The genomic positions of boundaries and dots anchor all display enrichment for cohesin by ChIP-seq. Acute depletion of CTCF leads to -wide loss of TADs and dots in Hi-C contact maps as well as a loss of cohesin ChIP-seq enrichment...
  2. ...separates nucleosomes belonging to each subtype at TSSs and CTCF sites (Fig. 3E; Supplemental Fig. S1B). Specifically, short-fragment nucleosomes are enriched at the centers of TSSs and CTCF sites, whereas canonical nucleosomes are well positioned in the flanking regions (Fig. 3E; Supplemental Fig. S1B...
  3. ...). The profiles are averaged over all NBCs (black), M-CLL (red), and U-CLL (blue) samples. The number of regions (N) is indicated on the graphs. (F) Same as panel E but for the transcriptionally inactive B compartment.CLL-specific changes in nucleosome positioning, CTCF binding, and histone modifications...
  4. ...the position of cohesin on chromatin and not its levels, as is the case in mammalian cells (Busslinger et al. 2017). These results indicate that in Xenopus pronuclei, cohesin does normally not accumulate at CTCF sites because most of these are not bound by CTCF unless CTCF is exogenously added.In Xenopus...
  5. .... 2013) and lead to functionally important variations in the chromatin states (Kasowski et al. 2013). However, it remains unclear what drives the selection of sites within the many weak CTCF motifs throughout the . Here, we set out to dissect how nucleosome positioning, DNA (de)methylation and cell type...
  6. ...300, at regions losing ESRRB and/or POU5F1/SOX2 binding, as well as at CTCF binding sites (Oomen et al. 2019). At regions losing ESRRB in mitosis, a clear nucleosomal organization is only appreciated when regions are aligned relative to the ESRRB peak summit or the binding motifs for POU5F1/SOX2...
  7. ...)methylation, nucleosome positioning, and chromatin binding of the architectural protein CTCF play an important role for establishing cell-type–specific chromatin states during differentiation. To elucidate molecular mechanisms that link these processes, we studied the perturbed DNA modification landscape in mouse...
  8. ...significantly higher amplitude than random oscillations (Fig. 6 shows four examples: Abf1 and Reb1 in yeast, and CTCF and GABPA in human). This indicates that TF motif matches seem to locate preferentially with respect to the rotational phasing of the DNA along the nucleosome. We then placed these 26 TF motifs...
  9. ...plots indicate that constitutive CTCF binding sites display markedly higher occupancy signal than sites that are dynamically altered upon changes in cellular state. These results confirm and extend recent reports suggesting that there is a larger class of dynamically occupied CTCF sites than previously...
  10. ...; Thorvaldsdottir et al. 2012). We compared the ability of NOMe-seq to accurately map the well-positioned nucleosomes flanking CTCF binding sites. We aligned reads to conserved CTCF binding motifs (Xie et al. 2007) located more than 2 kb away from TSSs that have been experimentally validated as bound in vivo...
For checked items

Preprint Server