Searching journal content for articles similar to Nguyen et al. 18 (11): 1711.

Displaying results 1-10 of 15
For checked items
  1. ...duplications. By adapting population genetic analyses for use with copy number data, we identified functional categories of genes that have likely evolved under purifying or positive selection for copy number changes. In particular, duplications and deletions of genes with inflammatory response and cell...
  2. ...these populations, implying a more or less constant accumulation of differences over time. Such progressive divergence is predicted by the neutral model of evolution, which assumes that mutations, drift, and purifying selection shape molecular evolution, while adaptive mutations are expected to be rare (Kimura 1983...
  3. ...selection prevails over positive selection in human copy number variant evolution. Genome Res 18: 1711–1723. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer, Berlin. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A, et al. 2009...
  4. ...capacitance (Fig. 3A) can be attributed to family size (gene copy number) effects. The number of paralogs is a determinant of dosage-related purifying selection. Whatever the divergence topology within the family, dosage imbalance is dependent on family size since the number of surviving paralogs determines...
  5. ...demonstrate that many mitochondrial-coding NUMTs exhibit signs of long-term selection. In a subset of these NUMT genes, we detected evolutionary signals consistent with adaptive evolution, including one human NUMT shared among seven ape species. These findings suggest that NUMT insertions may occasionally...
  6. ...(Hartmann et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2019; Fouché et al. 2023). SVs can influence gene expression, for example by the insertion or deletion of regulatory elements upstream of a gene (Butelli et al. 2012). Deleterious SVs are typically eliminated from populations by strong purifying selection (Elyashiv et al...
  7. ...of nonsynonymous variants (dN) as an indicator of selection, against that of synonymous variants (dS) representing the genetic drift. Therefore, a dN/dS ratio >>1 indicates positive selection, ∼1 indicates neutral evolution or genetic drift, and ≪1 negative selection (Kimura 1980). In line with this, our single...
  8. ..., that is, the ratio of nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitutions (Webster and Hurst 2012). In regions of low recombination, increased genetic interference should compromise both positive selection for advantageous variants and purifying selection against deleterious ones (Betancourt et al. 2009...
  9. ....6 per Mb) (Tajima 1983) and an excess of rare alleles (FS = 1.72) (Fu 1997) could be due to a pattern of clonal reproduction as well as purifying selection, which had a limited power to remove mildly deleterious variants. Comparing the proportions of nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations in our 17...
  10. ...(potentially haploinsufficient genes) retained ancestral expression patterns. However, the almost complete erosion of all other Y genes triggered the evolution of a highly efficient dosage compensation system, in which the loss of Y gene copies was compensated by a global twofold up-regulation of ancestral X...
For checked items

Preprint Server