Searching journal content for articles similar to Nayak et al. 19 (11): 1953.

Displaying results 1-10 of 273
For checked items
  1. ..., we performed weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) across four tissues (Supplemental Fig. S8A). The analysis revealed that LOC101800576 and LOC101790890 were assigned to the shell gland ME3 module, GLP2R to the spleen ME7 module, and LOC119713219 to the ovary ME6 module (Supplemental...
  2. ...–TF–target) inferred based on the contextualized TF–target interactions. Cell-specific coexpression networks Genome Research 3 www..org C D E F G H B2 B3 B4 A2 A3 Coexpression Cell type Figure 2. Coexpression between transcriptional factors and targets provides robust evidence to active gene regulation. (A) (A1...
  3. ...of genes examined, a potential solution to increase statistical power by reducing network complexity has been to utilize methods such as WGCNA that infer modules or groups of coexpressed genes that are regulated by one or more transcription factors rather than individual gene interactions (Segal et al...
  4. ...equally to this work. Corresponding author: johnq@hsph.harvard.eduAbstractGene regulatory networks (GRNs) are effective tools for inferring complex interactions between molecules that regulate biological processes and hence can provide insights into drivers of biological systems. Inferring coexpression...
  5. .... 2023) and found copy-number variation of cis-regulatory elements underlying differences in eud-1 expression and mouth form. However, outside of this case study, it is unknown which nodes of the network are being acted on by evolution. To expand upon these findings, we compared gene expression between...
  6. ....View larger version: In this window In a new window Figure 1. An illustrative diagram of PRS-Net. (A) The proposed framework is built upon GWAS summary statistics, including variants, risk alleles, P-values, and effect sizes. (B) A gene–gene interaction (GGI) network is constructed based on the protein...
  7. ...buffer gene expression variation at the protein level (Schmiedel et al. 2015). Evidence from miRNA overexpression studies indicate that miRNAs may increase variation at the RNA level (Gambardella et al. 2017; Rzepiela et al. 2018); however, transcriptome-wide evidence from natural cell conditions...
  8. ...of miRNAs and compared the expression profile between all miRNA/coding gene pairs from the same sRNA-seq. Then, we identified those pairs with known interactions previously described in the literature as compiled in miRTarBase (see Methods). In this analysis, we used all the samples available for small...
  9. ...QTL) across different cell types and in dynamic processes (Van Der Wijst et al., 2018; Soskic et al., 2022). A key opportunity unveiled by emerging scRNA-seq datasets is the construction of personalized gene coexpression networks which can be leveraged to link network-level properties to phenotypic variation...
  10. ....zhang@mssm.eduAbstractCancer is a complex disease with diverse molecular mechanisms that affect patient prognosis. Network-based approaches are effective in revealing a holistic picture of cancer prognosis and gene interactions. However, a comprehensive landscape of coexpression networks and prognostic gene modules across multiple cancer...
For checked items

Preprint Server