Searching journal content for articles similar to Moorthy et al. 27 (2): 246.

Displaying results 1-10 of 22
For checked items
  1. ...with a more extensive network of chromatin interactions to multiple distant target genes (Cao et al. 2017), to serve as regulatory hubs to govern processes important to cell identity (Whyte et al. 2013). This led us to question whether MYC enhancer invasion might preferentially occur at super-enhancers...
  2. ...with a published analysis that dissected the Sox2 locus in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) (Brosh et al. 2023). Eighty synthetic payloads were delivered, replacing either the full 143 kb locus or 43 kb locus control region (LCR) required for Sox2 expression in mESCs, and included multiple categories...
  3. .... Super-enhancers delineate disease-associated regulatory nodes in T cells. Nature 520: 558–562. Vella P, Barozzi I, Cuomo A, Bonaldi T, Pasini D. 2012. Yin Yang 1 extends the Myc-related transcription factors network in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 3403–3418. Vermunt MW, Reinink P, Korving...
  4. .... 2018. Functional dissection of the enhancer repertoire in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 23: 276–288.e8. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.06.014 ↵Blinka S, Reimer MH Jr., Pulakanti K, Rao S. 2016. Super-enhancers at the Nanog locus differentially regulate neighboring pluripotency-associated genes...
  5. ...reveals that pluripotent stem cell enhancers contain a conserved regulatory codeTo decipher the regulatory code in pluripotent cells, we investigated regions bound by multiple transcription factors in mouse and human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (* in Fig. 1A), as these regions are more likely to show...
  6. ...–Whitney U tests, with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing, (***) corrected P-values < 0.001. See also Supplemental Figures S1 and S2 and Supplemental Table S1.To compare regulatory regions across the four study species, we used pairwise whole- alignments to identify promoters and enhancers...
  7. ...corresponding to strong promoter-proximal enhancers, further indicating the presence of chromatin regulatory features that allow for the robust and highly regulated activation of target genes.View larger version: In this window In a new window Figure 4. Chromatin states in transcriptional signature genes. (A...
  8. ...factors can increase methylation of the histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4; SPI1 [Ghisletti et al. 2010; Heinz et al. 2010]; FOXA1 [Sérandour et al. 2011; Jozwik et al. 2016]). Once established, multiple genomic and epigenetic features mark the state of an active enhancer, including enhanced chromatin...
  9. ...or intermediate enhancer configuration in mouse embryonic stem cells (Fig. 1C,E; Creyghton et al. 2010; Zentner et al. 2011). Here we adopt the poised enhancer nomenclature for these clusters. All the putative enhancer clusters demonstrated a distinct “valley” shape, focused on the maximal point of DNase I...
  10. ...; Dias et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017).Convergence in thylacine and wolf brain enhancersGREAT analysis of TWARs also revealed significant enrichment of nearby brain-expressed genes (Supplemental Table S15), and several nervous system genes had multiple TWARs within their GREAT-defined gene regulatory...
For checked items

Preprint Server