Searching journal content for articles similar to Lifanov et al. 13 (4): 579.

Displaying results 1-10 of 37
For checked items
  1. ...binding factors can give rise to long-range interactions via bridging-induced clustering. We propose that long-range interactions between cis-regulatory elements are driven by at least three distinct processes: cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, polycomb contacts, and clustering of active regions.The large...
  2. ...different modules. These methods have been used to predict complexes forming along the chromatin and colocalization of TFs. However, they explicitly require regulatory information in terms of other high-throughput experiments for each region, which act as features for clustering. They do not incorporate...
  3. ...has been extensively studied and used for predicting novel regulatory elements and their function, grouping of binding sites for the same transcription factor (TF) into homotypic clusters of TFBSs (HCTs) has been studied and observed almost exclusively in invertebrates, especially inDrosophila...
  4. ...for understanding the wiring of these large regulatory networks, they are not informative about how the quantitative relationship between TF and target gene expression is encoded in the DNA. It is still not well understood how promoter architecture determines how each target of a TF will respond to changes...
  5. ...; Schmidt et al. 2010; Xie et al. 2010). In these elements, which we term ‘‘covert’’ elements, the regulatory encryption is conserved, but embedded within a divergent sequence background. Individual instances of covert regulatory elements have been previously reported in Drosophila (Dermitzakis et al. 2003...
  6. ...predict context-specific binding and that the predictions work across different Drosophila species suggests that characteristic motif combinations are shared between sites, revealing context-specific motif codes ( cis -regulatory signatures), which appear to be conserved during evolution. Taken together...
  7. ...the activity of TF motifs, remains poorly understood. Here, we explore the rules of enhancer syntax by a two-pronged approach in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells: we (1) replace important TF motifs by all possible 65,536 eight-nucleotide-long sequences and (2) paste eight important TF motif types into 763...
  8. ...and preferentially in a homotypic fashion: Active promoters contact more often active chromatin sites than expected by the -wide distribution of chromatin states, and vice versa, repressed promoters contact repressed chromatin sites more often, in line with the findings reported for the HoxD cluster (Noordermeer et...
  9. ...in enhancers or active TSSs, maintained borders are located in euchromatin and lost borders in euchromatin islands in heterochromatin.Compared to maintained and new borders, lost TAD borders are also enriched in clusters of noncoding regulatory elements that display extreme levels of sequence conservation...
  10. ...expression by miRNA and siRNAs. Intramolecular and intermolecular interactions are interdependent, and according to the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis (Salmena et al. 2011; Gardiner et al. 2015), intermolecular RNA interactions have the potential to rewire regulatory networks and expand...
For checked items

Preprint Server