Searching journal content for articles similar to Keren et al. 25 (12): 1893.

Displaying results 1-10 of 406
For checked items
  1. ...sample when performing sRNA-seq for dual profiling. In contrast, degradation bias (half-life analysis) and noise from housekeeping genes do not appear to have a significant effect upon or bias our approach. For the latter, Gene Ontology analysis identified tissue-specific pathways, reinforcing...
  2. ..., hinging on the precise binding of transcription factors (TFs) and cofactors to gene regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers. Although it is relatively routine to profile -wide DNA binding landscapes of proteins, identifying the specific proteins that bind to, and regulate the transcription of...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  3. ...sacrificing signal from genuine nascent transcripts.The second stage of the analysis involved quantifying RNAPII elongation rates from noise-corrected read coverage profiles. For each individual gene, read coverage was quantified at every single base pair position from the transcription start site...
  4. ...using edgeR (v4.2.1) and ranked using the Signal2Noise metric with the local version of the GSEA tool (v4.3.3; http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp). GSEA was performed using the Hallmark, C2, and C5 gene sets from MSigDB, with clusterProfiler (v4.12.6) (Xu et al. 2024). Statistical testing...
  5. ...as pioneer factors and activators by increasing gene accessibility and activating the expression of lineage specification genes during cell fate conversion. iTF-seq has utility in both mapping cell fate conversion and understanding cell fate conversion mechanisms.Master transcription factors (TFs), which...
  6. ....porse@finsenlab.dk, sachin.pundhir@finsenlab.dkAbstractSWI/SNF and NuRD are protein complexes that antagonistically regulate DNA accessibility. However, repression of their activities often leads to unanticipated changes in target gene expression (paradoxical), highlighting our incomplete understanding of their activities...
  7. ...–dependent gene regulatory interactions, which cannot be represented as static networks (Huang et al. 2018). Because of the specificity and dynamics of tissue microenvironments, technical noise, and impacts from other sources at single-cell resolution, the transcriptomic gene expression levels may be partially...
  8. ...genes (HVGs) as input through a pair of coupled batchnorm layers to account for large variations in gene expression levels, making it more robust and generalizable. Third, scTIE provides the means to extract interpretable features from the common embedding space by linking the developmental trajectories...
  9. ...-acting proteins that bind cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in DNA to control gene expression. Here, we analyzed the genomic localization profiles of 529 sequence-specific TFs and 151 cofactors and chromatin regulators in the human cancer cell line HepG2, for a total of 680 broadly termed DNA-associated proteins...
  10. ..., 100871; 3Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China, 100871 Corresponding author: yihan.lin@pku.edu.cnAbstractSingle-cell transcriptome data has been widely used to reconstruct gene regulatory networks (GRNs) controlling...
For checked items

Preprint Server