Searching journal content for articles similar to Kasukawa et al. 13 (6b): 1542.

Displaying results 1-10 of 153
For checked items
  1. ...). For benchmarking purposes, we used the well-annotated human and long-read cDNA reads of the human cell line WTC11 generated by the Long-read RNA-seq Genome Annotation Assessment Project (LRGASP) (Pardo-Palacios et al. 2024b). We exemplify the utility of the best-performing approach on the annotation...
  2. ...://www.earthbio.org), which aims to annotate approximately 1.5 million eukaryotic species, further require that the annotation pipeline is highly automated and reliable, and ideally, no manual work for each species is required when assembly and RNA-seq are given.Further, species that have an annotation also require...
  3. ...annotation should contain information on what tissues express what transcript isoforms at what level. This tissue-level isoform information can then inform a wide range of research questions as well as experiment designs. Long-read sequencing technology combined with advanced full-length cDNA library...
  4. ...sequence tags (ESTs) and cDNAs, with fewer than 0.5 M cDNAs and ∼8.5 M ESTs ever captured. In an era of relative data sparsity, annotating every transcript detected was a plausible goal notwithstanding the immaturity of much of the software and computational tooling supporting the annotation effort...
  5. ...in the assessment of the accuracy of gene prediction are more stringent; they require exact matches of predicted and annotated CDSs. Although BUSCO scores are overly optimistic if used for assessment of gene-prediction quality, they are certainly helpful for the coarse evaluation of completeness of assembly...
  6. ...a comparison and includes equivalent data for the current mouse reference assembly GRCm39 (NCBI Mus musculus annotation release 109). Although the mouse assembly annotation arises from a different data set of mouse RefSeq sequences, which includes a larger accumulation of cDNA and other sequencing data...
  7. ...alignments. Bioinformatics 29: 1341–1342. ↵Hoff K, Stanke M. 2015. Current methods for automated annotation of protein-coding genes. Curr Opin Insect Sci 7: 8–14. ↵Holt C, Yandell M. 2011. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and -database management tool for second-generation projects. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 491...
  8. ....1, respectively. cDNA sequences of 50 novel genes identified against the previous An. stephensi assembly annotations (ASTEI1) from VectorBase have been submitted to dbEST (https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucest) under the GenBank accession numbers JZ152704.1–JZ152780.1. Acknowledgments This paper is funded...
  9. ...FANTOM2-MATRICS (Mouse Annotation Teleconference for RIKEN cDNA sequences; The FANTOM Consortium and the RIKEN Genome Exploration Research Group Phase I & II Team 2002 ). The primary goals of MATRICS were to provide human-evaluated computational gene assignments (i.e., most informative gene names...
  10. .... The finished genomic sequence is analyzed using a modified Ensembl pipeline (Searle et al. 2004), and BLAST results of cDNAs/ ESTs and proteins, along with various ab initio predictions, can be analyzedmanually in the annotation browser toolOtterlace (http:// www...
For checked items

Preprint Server