Searching journal content for articles similar to Jolma et al. 20 (6): 861.

Displaying results 1-10 of 14
For checked items
  1. ...approaches preceding the availability of structural data. PWM-based predictions depend on databases like TRANSFAC (Matys et al. 2006) and JASPAR (Khan et al. 2018). Modern high-throughput techniques that experimentally identify protein–DNA binding, such as ChIP-seq, SELEX, and protein-binding microarrays...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  2. ...for understanding gene regulation. Although DNA-binding specificities for thousands of transcription factors (TFs) have been determined, the specific amino acid–base interactions comprising their structural interfaces are largely unknown. This lack of resolution hampers attempts to leverage these data in order...
  3. ..., and specificity for cell types and states.ResultsScreening PCRP mAbs by ChIP-exoWe used the massively parallel ChIP-exo version of ChIP-seq to screen PCRP Abs in a 96-well plate format (48 at a time) for their ability to recognize their putative protein targets in a chromatinized, cellular context (Rhee and Pugh...
  4. ...binding data from ChIP, evolutionary conservation, and PWM models of binding specificity. The latter can be derived by several experimental methods, including protein binding arrays (Zhu et al. 2009), Selex ( Jolma et al. 2010), and yeast one-hybrid assays (Reece-Hoyes et al. 2011). Interestingly...
  5. ...bind to methylated sequences (Hu et al. 2013). Just above our significance threshold, both NRF1 and ZFP809 (FDR adjusted P-values = 0.18) were also enriched near sites with greater ASE in methylated condition. NRF1 is part of the bZIP TF family, which has been demonstrated via SELEX binding assays...
  6. ...for further experimental exploration. Recent technologies including protein binding microarrays (Berger et al. 2008), highthroughput SELEX ( Jolma et al. 2010), and ChIP-seq itself have facilitated the quantification of the binding preferences of hundreds of different TFs.Meanwhile, decades of protein...
  7. ...sites and regulate similarly distinct sets of target genes. To address this paradox, we determined the intrinsic specificities of the AR and GR DNA-binding domains using a refined version of SELEX-seq. We developed an algorithm, SelexGLM, that quantifies binding specificity over a large (31-bp) binding...
  8. ...capture has revealed a set of proteins in intimate contact with mRNAs across different eukaryotic systems (Baltz et al. 2012; Castello et al. 2012; Kwon et al. 2013; Sysoev et al. 2016; Wessels et al. 2016; Despic et al. 2017). In vitro affinity selection methods, such as SELEX (Blackwell and Weintraub...
  9. ...and Stormo 2014), Slim (Keilwagen and Grau 2015), and TFFM (Mathelier and Wasserman 2013) motif models in predicting in vitro TF binding sites using HTSELEX data (Jolma et al. 2013). The various motif models were trained using ChIP-seq binding data as above. For the TFs that were profiled in both HT-SELEX...
  10. ...to fully annotate transcriptional regulatory networks in metazoan s. As a first step in this process, we have characterized the DNA-binding specificities of 129 zinc finger sets from Drosophila using a bacterial one-hybrid system. This data set contains the DNA-binding specificities for at least one...
For checked items

Preprint Server