Searching journal content for articles similar to Jansen et al. 12 (1): 37.

Displaying results 1-10 of 26
For checked items
  1. ...TFs regulate gene expression through both promoters and enhancers.The recurrent TFs form an extensive network by way of physical protein-protein interactions (PPIs), with MYC and SMAD proteins acting as interaction hubs (Fig. 4A). The premigratory NC pool size regulators ZBTB17 and MYC...
  2. ...compared gene duplicates resulting from a recent whole genome duplication to a set of tandemly duplicated genes in the model forest tree Populus trichocarpa . We used a combination of microarray expression analyses of a diverse set of tissues and functional annotation to assess factors related...
  3. ...paralogon are preferentially retained in cis after WGD. We compare the number of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) between linked singletons within a paralogon (defined as cis -PPIs) with that of PPIs between singletons across paralogon pairs (defined as trans -PPIs). We find that paralogons in which...
  4. .... 1999) or their exon structure (Altschmied et al. 2002), or their activities (Zhang et al. 2002; Zhang 2003), and such changes can alter protein–protein interactions or subsequent developmental or physiological functions. 3Corresponding author. E-mail jpostle@uoneuro.uoregon.edu; fax (541) 346...
  5. ...a sister gene, how extensive this epistasis is, and how adaptable it is toward alternate environmental states. To this end, we have performed a comprehensive experimental analysis of epistasis as indicated by aggravating genetic interactions between paralogs resulting from an ancient whole-genome...
  6. ...1970; Lynch 2002) but also by several rounds of whole duplication (WGD) (Jaillon et al. 2004; Dehal and Boore 2005), which were typically followed by extensive gene loss. These WGD events would thus have had significant effects on gene regulatory control and protein–protein interactions. Nonetheless...
  7. ...studies have sought to catalog driver events occurring in hundreds of cancer genes across different tumor types (Martincorena and Campbell 2015; Chung et al. 2016; Tokheim and Karchin 2019; Dietlein et al. 2020; Kumar et al. 2020; The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium 2020...
  8. ...Whole-genome Trees Based on the Occurrence of Folds and Orthologs: Implications for Comparing Genomes on Different Levels Jimmy Lin 1 and Mark Gerstein 1 , 2 1Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 USA...
  9. ...to known cancer drivers in the STRING protein–protein interaction network (n = 55, P-value = 2 × 10−5) (Supplemental Fig. S6E; Shin et al. 2007; Lisewski et al. 2014; Szklarczyk et al. 2015), and a nonsynonymous-to-synonymous mutation ratio, dN/dS, greater than one and consistent with positive selection (n...
  10. ...with transcription and translation, gene-loss events will be concentrated among interaction partners of single-copy genes, where stoichiometry is disrupted. However, permutation tests on the protein–protein interaction networks involving these complexes revealed that this is not the case (Methods). Also...
For checked items

Preprint Server