Searching journal content for articles similar to Jakobsen et al. 23 (4): 592.

Displaying results 1-10 of 6198
For checked items
  1. ...,036 potential causal variants (posterior inclusion probability [PIP] > 0.9) for 1186, 3592, 1685, and 2996 eGenes in the liver, ovary, shell gland, and spleen, respectively (Supplemental Table S6). These results provide a high-confidence set of candidate regulatory variants that can serve as reliable targets...
  2. ...that this colocalization enables the coordinated occupancy of SMARCA4 and H73-methylated ACTB at genes involved in cell adhesion and mRNA translation. Finally, phenotypic assays confirm these regulatory effects. Together, these findings uncover a new mechanistic layer of selective transcriptional regulation mediated...
  3. ...and compared with all HCNEs (Fig. 4H; Supplemental Figs. S14–S18).Consistent with expectations, our analyses reveal a highly significant association between endoderm HCNEs and genes encoding DNA-binding and gene regulatory proteins, including HMG domain-containing and chromatin binding factors. Notably...
  4. ...networks in microglia for SPI1, IRF1, and CEBPB, highlighting predicted candidate target genes that exhibit significant expression change during AD progression or are annotated in AD-associated GWAS locus. (B) TF regulatory networks in excitatory neurons for the TFs JUN, JUND, FOSB, NEUROD2, and NEUROD6...
  5. ...polyploidization as well as changes in calcium dynamics and metabolism following stress with endothelin-1. Collectively, these results identify regulatory mechanisms of cardiac gene programs that modulate cardiomyocyte maturation, affect cellular stress response, and could serve as potential therapeutic targets...
  6. ...and its potential target gene during myogenesis. Our findings reveal the dynamic regulatory features of SEs in skeletal muscle development and provide a general integrative framework for identifying critical enhancers underlying the formation of complex traits.Skeletal muscle, which constitutes nearly...
  7. ...transcriptional programs. Gene expression is regulated by cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in a spatiotemporal manner through precise gene regulatory networks (Lee and Young 2013; Levine et al. 2014; Long et al. 2016). Understanding these regulatory mechanisms beyond transcription may reveal critical aspects of how...
  8. ...CREs. For the proximal cCRE, the highlighted TFs are a group of proximal regulators, such as ZBTB4, VENTX, FEV (ETS family), CEBPA, POU2F3, which are partly supported by relevant ChIP-seq binding data sets (Fig. 6F,G). It has been reported in the literature that ZBTB4 is involved in the negative regulation...
  9. ...Dynamic barriers modulate cohesin positioning and folding at fixed occupancy Hadi Rahmaninejad, Yao Xiao, Maxime M.C. Tortora and Geoffrey Fudenberg Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA Corresponding authors...
  10. ...to a methylation-sensitive site within BCL6 exon1A, maintaining BCL6 expression by preventing its negative autoregulation. TRIM28 has been shown to interact with transcription CEBPB, potentially modulating its transcriptional activity through the formation of multimeric complexes (Shibata et al. 2011).These...
For checked items

Preprint Server