Searching journal content for articles similar to Inoue et al. 27 (1): 38.

Displaying results 1-10 of 17
For checked items
  1. OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  2. ...).Beyond biological relevance, it is also important to distinguish between methods that study the steady state of the cell versus those that introduce experimental perturbations for comparative analysis. Some techniques rely on genetic modifications to reveal functional differences. Gain-of-function approaches...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  3. ....3% unidirectional versus 27.5% and 20.7% bidirectional expression from promoter and enhancer regions, respectively (Fig. 2D,E). The general unidirectional activity is also demonstrated by negative correlation between expression measurements in the plus and minus strands for promoters (R = −0.27, P < 0...
  4. .... Therefore, chromatin accessibility is a vital regulator of enhancer function, and this is evidenced by the observation that ∼94% of all ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peaks fall within accessible chromatin (Klemm et al. 2019). In any given cell type, only a small fraction (∼2%) of the is accessible to TF binding...
  5. ..., at least in part, technical in nature. Accordingly, we restricted subsequent analyses to data generated on pCrx, which appears to have a broader dynamic range.Dimeric CRX binding sites encode stronger enhancers than monomeric CRX binding sitesAs discussed above, homeodomain TFs bind DNA as both monomers...
  6. ...-bound loci are partially predictive of episomal MPRA activity, and distal elements whose accessibility increases later in retinal development are enriched for CREs with silencer activity. We identified a set of potentially pleiotropic regulatory elements that convert from silencers to enhancers in retinas...
  7. ...-seq), like other episomal massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) (Melnikov et al. 2012; Patwardhan et al. 2012), directly quantifies enhancer activity by relying on transcription factors within a host cell system, thereby removing any chromatin-associated biases (Arnold et al. 2013). STARR-seq takes...
  8. ...reveals substantial differences in chromosomal versus episomal encoding of enhancer activity. Genome Res 27: 38–52. Johnson GD, Barrera A, McDowell IC, D’Ippolito AM, Majoros WH, Vockley CM, Wang X, Allen AS, Reddy TE. 2018. Human -wide measurement of drug-responsive regulatory activity. Nat Commun 9...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLEACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
  9. ...versus episomal encoding of enhancer activity. Genome Res 27: 38–52. doi:10.1101/gr.212092.116 ↵Kheradpour P, Ernst J, Melnikov A, Rogov P, Wang L, Zhang X, Alston J, Mikkelsen TS, Kellis M. 2013. Systematic dissection of regulatory motifs in 2000 predicted human enhancers using a massively parallel...
  10. ...(ESCs). The resulting loss- and gain-of-function experiments reveal that CpGs contribute to transcriptional output independent of DNA methylation.ResultsParallel reporter assay at a defined chromosomal siteInvestigating CpG function necessitates an approach that systematically compares different...
For checked items

Preprint Server