Searching journal content for articles similar to Garrigan et al. 22 (8): 1499.

Displaying results 1-10 of 24
For checked items
  1. ...on mutational processes shaping two functionally important tandem arrays in the Drosophila .ResultsGenome assembliesThe strains selected include the Drosophila community's reference strain (iso-1) (Adams et al. 2000) and two strains from the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource (A3 and A4) (King et al. 2012...
  2. ...total TE sequence in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster, which is substantially lower than previously reported (Young and Schwartz 1981; Dowsett and Young 1982; Nuzhdin 1995; Vieira et al. 1999; Vieira and Biémont 2004; Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium 2007).Intron size evolution may also be modulated...
  3. ...of de novo genes that emerged within a single species. We sequenced and assembled s with long-read technology and the corresponding transcriptomes from inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster, derived from seven geographically diverse populations. We found line-specific neORFs in abundance but few ne...
  4. ...million years of divergence, showed that ∼30%–40% of their s retain conserved TADs. Comparative genomic analysis of 17 Drosophila species revealed that chromosomal rearrangement breakpoints are enriched at TAD boundaries but depleted within TADs. Additionally, genes within conserved TADs show lower...
  5. ...of these assemblies (Supplemental Fig. S15). To detect patterns of concerted evolution, we constructed a neighbor-joining tree using monomers from the 260-bp locus, the five contigs containing 353/356-bp repeats, an X-linked 1.688 repeat (359-bp), and a related repeat (360-bp) fromDrosophila simulans (Fig. 6). We...
  6. ...result in reduced differentiation and an excess of shared variation between sympatric populations comparedwith allopatric populations. This logic has been applied on a genomic scale to test for gene flow in Drosophila (Kulathinal et al. 2009) andhominids (Green et al. 2010). However, this approach does...
  7. ...); it is essential for organismal form, fitness, and function, and frequently varies within and between species. Comparative studies using genomic surveys of gene expression in yeast (Busby et al. 2011), Drosophila (Rifkin et al. 2003), and mammalian species (Brawand et al. 2011) with a range of divergence times...
  8. ...Genome-wide patterns of natural variation reveal strong selective sweeps and ongoing genomic conflict in Drosophila mauritiana Viola Nolte , Ram Vinay Pandey , Robert Kofler and Christian Schlötterer 1 Institut für Populationsgenetik...
  9. ...). The publicly available assemblies of these species are of vastly different quality. The s of D.melanogaster,D. sechellia, andD. simulanswere originally sequenced to ;12-, five-, and threefold coverage, respectively (Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium 2007). In addition, the strains used in our study likely...
  10. ....0001) (Fig. 6D). Moreover, PSCmutations are nonuniformly distributed along coding sequences (χ2 = 92.37, P < 0.0001), being more prevalent in the last 10% of coding sequences (Fig. 6C) as seen in Drosophila (Hoehn et al. 2012; Lee and Reinhardt 2012). However, unlike in D. melanogaster (Lee and Reinhardt...
For checked items

Preprint Server