Searching journal content for articles similar to Fassler et al. 12 (8): 1190.

Displaying results 1-4 of 4
For checked items
  1. INSIGHT/OUTLOOK: Intraproteomic Networks: New Forays Into Predicting Interaction Partners
    • L. Aravind and
    • Lakshminarayan M. Iyer
    Genome Res. August 1, 2002 12: 1156-1158; doi:10.1101/gr.353302
    ...together, Fassler et al. (2002) present extrapolations for the dimerization specificities of B-ZIP proteins from the complete proteome of Drosophila melanogaster . The authors observe that a large number of the Drosophila B-ZIP proteins contain a polar residue (usually asparagines) in the first position...
  2. Research: Competition for DNA binding between paralogous transcription factors determines their genomic occupancy and regulatory functions
    • Yuning Zhang,
    • Tiffany D. Ho,
    • Nicolas E. Buchler,
    • and Raluca Gordân
    Genome Res. July 2021 31: 1216-1229; Published in Advance May 11, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.275145.120
    ...scale. Nevertheless, the important role that competition can play in gene regulation has been investigated for certain TFs and focusing on particular genomic sites. A prominent example is that of Hox proteins in Drosophila, where paralogs with slightly different DNA-binding specificities, driven...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  3. Research: AP-1 subunits converge promiscuously at enhancers to potentiate transcription
    • Jungkyun Seo,
    • D. Dewran Koçak,
    • Luke C. Bartelt,
    • Courtney A. Williams,
    • Alejandro Barrera,
    • Charles A. Gersbach,
    • and Timothy E. Reddy
    Genome Res. April 2021 31: 538-550; Published in Advance March 5, 2021, doi:10.1101/gr.267898.120
    ...to the cooperative function of Hox-Exd/Pbx heterodimers with other TFs (Joshi et al. 2007), TFs during early adipogenesis (Siersbæk et al. 2011, 2014; Steger and Lazar 2011), and TFs in the of Drosophila (Moorman et al. 2006). Genomic loci occupied by multiple members of the FOX protein family are also more...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  4. Research: A systematic comparison reveals substantial differences in chromosomal versus episomal encoding of enhancer activity
    • Fumitaka Inoue,
    • Martin Kircher,
    • Beth Martin,
    • Gregory M. Cooper,
    • Daniela M. Witten,
    • Michael T. McManus,
    • Nadav Ahituv,
    • and Jay Shendure
    Genome Res. January 2017 27: 38-52; Published in Advance November 9, 2016, doi:10.1101/gr.212092.116
    ...activity in the lentiMPRA assay.ENCODE and other genomic annotations that predict enhancer activityWe evaluated whether genomic annotations, some numerical and other categorical (Supplemental File 3), were predictive of our results in HepG2 cells. The performance of individual numerical annotations...
For checked items

Search Results

New Search

Modify Results

Citation format:
Results / page:
Results order:

This search

  • Alert me when new articles matching this search are published
  • Download all citations on this page to my citation manager

Preprint Server



Current Issue

  1. March 2026, 36 (3)
  1. Current Issue
  1. Alert me to new issues of Genome Research