Searching journal content for articles similar to Farahbod et al..

Displaying results 1-10 of 5572
For checked items
  1. ...method for assigning calibrated confidence scores to chromatin state annotations. Toward this goal, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the reproducibility of the two most widely used existing SAGA methods, ChromHMM and Segway. We found that their predictions are frequently irreproducible...
  2. ...for various states of gene transcriptional status (active, bivalent, repressed), we have integrated several histone modifications generated from consecutive mouse embryo sections to reveal changes in chromatin states across the tissue. Overall, this spatial epigenomic technology combined with the use...
  3. ...-sequencing scale, a corresponding chromatin stripe is a place where multiple loop configurations are anchored to one particular part of the , and their “sliding states” are affected at the population level, giving them a stripe appearance on the chromatin contact map, which reflects the highly dynamic nature...
  4. ...NeXt-based architectures, we performed feature attribution using integrated gradients (Sundararajan et al. 2017) followed by motif discovery (Methods). This analysis revealed that the ConvNeXt-based models consistently learned sequence motifs corresponding to transcription factors with known roles in regulating chromatin...
  5. ...Highly accurate reference and method selection for universal cross–data set cell type annotation with CAMUS Qunlun Shen1,2, Shuqin Zhang1,3 and Shihua Zhang2,4,5 1School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China; 2State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Sciences, Academy...
  6. ..., particularly for unsupervised cellular state annotation based on maximum signature score values. However, this application requires robust and comparable score distributions across diverse signatures and experimental conditions. Our systematic evaluation of established scoring methodologies—Seurat, SCANPY...
  7. ..., Barnett-Itzhaki Z, Jaitin D, Amann-Zalcenstein D, Lara-Astiaso D, Amit I. 2013. High-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation for -wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions and epigenomic states. Nat Protoc 8: 539–554. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.023 ↵Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic...
  8. .... Finally, we determine cell-type-specific replication timing profiles, integrating our in vivo data sets with published data using cultured cell lines. Our results reveal that GSC-like cells display a distinct replication program, compared with somatic lineages, that aligns with chromatin state differences...
  9. ...interactions. An interaction was characterized as a direct interaction if an annotated binding site related to the mutant was confirmed by a motif or external binding evidence at the specific target gene (MacIsaac et al. 2006; Grant et al. 2011; Rossi et al. 2021). Chromatin signatures were consistent with up...
  10. ...Notable challenges posed by long-read sequencing for the study of transcriptional diversity and annotation Carolina Monzó1, Adam Frankish2 and Ana Conesa1 1Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Paterna 46980, Spain; 2European Molecular...
For checked items

Preprint Server