Searching journal content for articles similar to Ewing and Green 8 (3): 186.

Displaying results 1-10 of 166
For checked items
  1. ...sequencing instruments. DNA Sequence 3: 107–110. Ewing, B. and P. Green. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. (this issue). Giddings, M.C., R.L. Brumley Jr., M. Haker, and L.M. Smith. 1993. An adaptive, object oriented strategy for base-calling...
  2. ...it is commonly referred to as the phred quality score. Base-specific quality scores in Bustard By definition, the error probability PðBt 6¼bÞ of a base-call is the sumof the probabilities of the three alternate bases being correct, i.e., PðBt 6¼AÞ = PðBt = CÞ +PðBt = GÞ+PðBt = TÞ; and so on. If we wish...
  3. ...of quality score is that used in phred (Ewing and Green 1998); it is a transformed error probability of a base, defined more precisely as follows: Let er,m denote the probability that rm, themth base of read r, is erroneously called. Then, the phred quality score qr,m for rm is given by qr;m = 10 log10 er...
  4. ...final error rate as the human finisher. For the four projects combined, we estimate an additional 64 reads would have been required, for a total of 608 reads, about 12% more than in the Human-only projects. Because of improvements in Autofinish and Phred ( Ewing et al. 1998 ) since this competition, we...
  5. ...Bastide M, McCombie WR, Hannon GJ. 2008. AltaCyclic: A self-optimizing base caller for next-generation sequencing.Nat Methods 5: 679–682. Ewing B, Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8: 186–194. Hashimoto S, Suzuki Y, Kasai Y, Morohoshi...
  6. ...detection algorithms use a combination of base-calling error probabilities, trace file analysis, template information, and redundancy analysis. The result is a number of—sometimes partial—real mRNA transcripts, which were present in the clone libraries and consecutively sequenced. It is important to note...
  7. .... Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8 : 186 – 194 . ↵ Ewing B.G. , Hillier L. , Wendl M.C. , Green P. ( 1998 ) Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8 : 175 – 185 . ↵ Gleeson T. , Hillier L. ( 1991 ) A trace display and editing program for data from...
  8. ...of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities . Genome Res. 8 : 186 – 194 . ↵ Ewing, B. , Hillier, L. , Wendl, M.C. , Green, P. ( 1998 ) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred . I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8 : 175 – 185 . ↵ Feil, E.J. , Spratt, B.G. ( 2001...
  9. ...., Fockler, C., Barnes, W.M., and Higuchi, R. 1994 . Effective amplification of long targets from cloned inserts and human genomic DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91 : 5695 -5699. ↵ Ewing, B. and Green, P. 1998 . Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred . II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8...
  10. ...sequence, Method 1 will tend to gather error statistics for regions where both basecallers generate few errors. It is possible, however, that what is given as additionally aligned bases in Method 1 for LifeTrace are in fact high-confidence base calls with few errors for a region where Phred introduces...
For checked items

Preprint Server