Searching journal content for articles similar to Earl et al..

Displaying results 1-6 of 6
For checked items
  1. ...benchmarks in the more general problem of whole- alignment (WGA). Using the same model as the successful Assemblathon competitions, we organized a competitive evaluation in which teams submitted their alignments and then assessments were performed collectively after all the submissions were received. Three...
  2. ...relevant loci. We additionally evaluated a collection of new de novo long-read haploid assemblies and conclude that although the new assemblies compare favorably to the reference with respect to continuity, error rate, and gene completeness, the reference still provides the best representation for complex...
  3. ...de novo assembly algorithms evaluated as part of the Assemblathon project (Earl et al. 2011; Bradnam et al. 2013). However, the data produced by CPT-seq is very different from that of mate-pair sequencing, consisting instead of sparse, shotgun representation of genomic DNA fragments that were...
  4. ...established de novo assemblers: ABySS, Velvet, and SOAPdenovo. The performance of SGA has also been validated in a complementary comparison by a recent collaborative de novo assembly assessment project, the Assemblathon, organized by UC Santa Cruz and UC Davis. The organizers publically released simulated...
  5. ..., in contrast with other recent assembly evaluations such as the Assemblathon (Earl et al. 2011) in which the assembly parameters were not described. We also note that all of the data used in our evaluations were real sequence data from high-throughput sequencing machines, unlike the Assemblathon, which used...
  6. ...coverage of large s in a cost-effective fashion (Schatz et al. 2010; Salzberg et al. 2012). However, there are inherent challenges in assembly because of repetitive sequences, high GC content, and chimeric reads (Schatz et al. 2010). Indeed, substantial differences in assemblies have been reported when...
For checked items

Preprint Server