Searching journal content for articles similar to Duncan and Dearden 20 (7): 917.

Displaying results 1-10 of 23
For checked items
  1. ...(Schmidt et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2012). In mammals, TE-derived sequences contribute up to 40% of -wide binding sites for TFs located in TE-rich regions (Sundaram et al. 2014). It has been proposed that such co-option of TE-regulatory elements for gene regulatory networks can provide substantial...
  2. ...2 functional genomics approaches to identify highly conserved endodermal cis-regulatory 30 modules (CRMs) functioning across the 400 million years of evolution separating zebrafish 31 and humans. Our analyses suggest that there are few endoderm-specific CRMs, with many 32 CRMs governing pancreas...
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
  3. ...1421, likely resulting from either tandem duplications and/or transposon-mediated sequence reshuffling (Supplemental Fig. S14).To further elucidate the mechanism underlying the rapid evolution of fbxn genes, we analyzed additional genes within the fbxn gene cluster region. Although most of these genes...
  4. ...identified LTR18A elements as potential enhancers in the human , primarily in epithelial cells. Together, our results provide a model for the origin, evolution, and co-option of TE-derived regulatory elements.Changes in gene regulation have long been implicated as crucial drivers in evolution (King...
  5. .... 2013. Endogenous retroviruses function as species-specific enhancer elements in the placenta. Nat Genet 45: 325–329. doi:10.1038/ng.2553 ↵Chuong EB, Elde NC, Feschotte C. 2016. Regulatory evolution of innate immunity through co-option of endogenous retroviruses. Science 351: 1083–1087. doi:10...
  6. ...more than 400 million years ago. Previous work has revealed that many KZFPs recognize transposable element (TE)-embedded sequences as genomic targets, and that KZFPs facilitate the co-option of the regulatory potential of TEs for the benefit of the host. Here, we present a comprehensive survey...
  7. ...is important for understanding the molecular and evolutionary processes that regulate chromosome structure and gene regulatory processes (Dekker and Mirny 2016; Kuroda et al. 2016) and how the evolution of X-linked genes influences local adaptation (Lasne et al. 2017).The extensive analysis of dosage...
  8. ....Transcription factors often work in clusters to bind TFBSs within enhancers to regulate target genes (Bradley et al. 2010; Long et al. 2016). Also, changes in types of TFBSs within enhancers during the course of evolution may lead to changes in the corresponding enhancersregulatory activity and specificity (Long et...
  9. ...that function as gene-remodeling platforms that stochastically sculpt gene expression and function in oocytes and zygotes. In comparison to enhancer evolution, LTR co-option presented here is more complex (involving simultaneous co-option of TSSs and SDs) and occurring at a large scale. Although fusion of ERVL...
  10. ..., consistent with previous work in embryonic stem cells (Fig. 2F; Kunarso et al. 2010), may allow for cell-type–specific evolution of the regulatory network by co-option of the transposed elements as regulatory elements, followed by fine-tuning through the selection of DNA mutations (Kunarso et al. 2010).While...
For checked items

Preprint Server