Searching journal content for articles similar to Djordjevic et al. 13 (11): 2381.

Displaying results 1-10 of 175
For checked items
  1. ...sitesA eukaryotic gene typically consists of regulatory elements such as distal enhancers, which can act over long distances; a proximal promoter containing key TF binding sites; a core promoter surrounding the transcription start site (TSS) where the preinitiation complex assembles, followed...
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
  2. ...by HOMER. (H) Example tracks of the region surrounding the promoter of a down-regulated DE gene (Itga4) showing ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq (H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K27me3, H3K9me3, IgG), and RNA-seq data. (I) Plots of mean coverage from 3 kb upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) to 3 kb downstream...
  3. ...Roadmap Projects have provided invaluable resources of the in vivo biochemical signatures, including chromatin accessibility and TF binding. Many exciting computational approaches have been developed to predict transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) and to study what controls the binding patterns...
  4. ...Renato Salazar1, Barbara Arbeithuber1,4, Maja Ivankovic1, Monika Heinzl1, Sofia Moura1, Ingrid Hartl1, Theresa Mair1, Angelika Lahnsteiner1,5, Thomas Ebner2, Omar Shebl2, Johannes Pröll3 and Irene Tiemann-Boege1 1Institute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria 4020; 2Department...
  5. ...by competing for their common putative genomic binding sites. The competition is different at different genomic sites, as dictated by the TFs’ expression levels and their divergence in DNA-binding specificity and affinity. Analyses of ChIP-seq data show that the biophysical rules that dictate the competitive...
  6. ...Unraveling determinants of transcription factor binding outside the core binding site Michal Levo 1 , 2 , 6 , Einat Zalckvar 1 , 2 , 6 , Eilon Sharon 1 , Ana Carolina Dantas Machado 3 , Yael Kalma 2 , Maya Lotam-Pompan 2...
  7. ...site carries 10% GNR, and the neighboring GT sites at position −1 have only 2% GNR. This difference in GNR may be due to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) consistent with out-of-frame transcript removal, since the difference of splice site positions is no multiple of three. In all these cases, noncanonical...
  8. ...): View larger version: In this window In a new window Figure 2. SelexGLM shows differences in DNA recognition between AR and GR throughout their binding sites. (A–D) Energy logos for AR-DBD (top) and GR-DBD (bottom), obtained by fitting biophysical models for protein–DNA interaction to the SELEX read...
  9. ...transcription factors were found to bind cooperatively to sites in the affected replication domains, providing provocative evidence that they constitute biologically significant directional interactions. Our findings suggest a regulatory link between the establishment of cell-type–specific TRNs and RT control...
  10. ...fraction of putative binding sites (BSs) that are occupied by transcription factors (TFs) in vivo can be highly variable across different cell types. This observation has been partly attributed to changes in chromatin accessibility and histone modification (HM) patterns surrounding BSs. Previous studies...
For checked items

Preprint Server