Searching journal content for articles similar to Corrales et al. 27 (7): 1153.

Displaying results 1-10 of 94
For checked items
  1. ...different cell types. This work has been cited extensively as evidence for housekeeping genes using common enhancers. The conclusion, however, was based on the work conducted on a few promoters in two Drosophila cell lines (Zabidi et al. 2015) and the STARR-seq system using a reporter gene to observe...
  2. ...and dev promoters used. Alternatively, the differences might be due to technical differences between the episomal MPRAs used previously and the -integrated assays used here, or to biological differences between Drosophila and human cells. Controlling the intrinsic strengths of different classes...
  3. ...organism Encyclopedia of Regulatory Networks) consortia to systematically assay TF binding events in vivo in two major model organisms, Drosophila melanogaster (fly) and Caenorhabditis elegans (worm). These data sets comprise 605 TFs identifying 3.6 M sites in the fly and 356 TFs identifying 0.9 M sites...
  4. ...). With the growing appreciation of the importance of core promoters in determining gene expression, two recent studies measured the autonomous promoter activity of random native sequences -wide in human and Drosophila (Arnold et al. 2017; Cvetesic and Lenhard 2017; van Arensbergen et al. 2017). These approaches...
  5. ...by coordinated actions of genomic regions that control the activity of multiple sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Using -wide approaches to interrogate chromatin function, we here identify the elements that regulate tissue recovery in Drosophila imaginal discs, which show a high regenerative capacity after...
  6. ...to be associated with TATA boxes and CpG islands, respectively (Carninci et al. 2006). These two promoter classes have also been found in Drosophila melanogaster (Rach et al. 2009; Ni et al. 2010; Hoskins et al. 2011), but there is a difference in the associated motifs between human and Drosophila; the broad...
  7. ...supercoiling-dependent manner in vitro (Belotserkovskii et al. 2010), and promoter-proximal pausing has been correlated with local thermodynamic stability of the RNA:DNA duplex in Drosophila (Nechaev et al. 2010). Consistent with a tetheringmodel, Pol II paused in close proximity to the G-rich sequences...
  8. ...between enhancers and promoters, divergent transcription, and insulator proteins on TAD border formation in Drosophila.ResultsCharacterization of TADs based on border conservation in DrosophilaTADs have been analyzed in Drosophila previously (Hou et al. 2012; Sexton et al. 2012; Li et al. 2015; Ulianov et...
  9. ...motifs embedded in nucleosomes, Zld’s ability to reduce nucleosome occupancy and facilitate the binding of TFs certainly fulfills a pioneering role. The pioneering role we presented here for Zld during Drosophila ZGAmay be a general feature of key zygotic activators. For example, Pou5f3, which controls...
  10. ...has been extensively studied and used for predicting novel regulatory elements and their function, grouping of binding sites for the same transcription factor (TF) into homotypic clusters of TFBSs (HCTs) has been studied and observed almost exclusively in invertebrates, especially inDrosophila...
For checked items

Preprint Server