Searching journal content for articles similar to Collins et al. 13 (1): 27.

Displaying results 1-10 of 13
For checked items
  1. ...of targeted BAC clone sequence) to the pig, human, and mouse assemblies. A comprehensive analysis of annotated X-linked orthologs in public databases demonstrated that the majority of ampliconic gene families were present on the ancestral placental X Chromosome. We generated a domestic cat Hi-C contact map...
  2. ...(based on the homologous L. major chromosomes), while the latter are fused at the 39 endof chromosome36 and the 59 endof chromosome 20. The gene models and functional annotation, based on predicted orthology, were transferred from L. major to the L. mexicana U1103 using the Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool...
  3. ...Press References ↵ Collins, J.E., Goward, M.E., Cole, C.G., Smink, L.J., Huckle, E.J., Knowles, S., Bye, J.M., Beare, D.M., and Dunham, I. 2003 . Reevaluating human gene annotation: A second-generation analysis of chromosome 22. Genome Res. 13 : 27 -36. ↵ Deloukas, P., Matthews, L.H., Ashurst, J...
  4. .... In this report, we refer to TUs identical to known genes as “known genes,” or simply “genes,” and to TUs identified by our analysis but devoid of known-gene identities and public-database annotations as “novel TUs,” or simply “TUs.” The goal of the present study was to annotate TUs and UGPs on chromosome 22 (chr...
  5. ...studies have demonstrated compelling biological and disease roles for individual examples, analytical and experimental approaches to investigate these genes have been hampered by the lack of comprehensive lncRNA annotation. Here, we present and analyze the most complete human lncRNA annotation to date...
  6. ...initiation site of human genes. In Silico Biol. 2 : 461 -465. ↵ Collins, J.E., Goward, M.E., Cole, C.G., Smink, L.J., Huckle, E.J., Knowles, S., Bye, J.M., Beare, D.M., and Dunham, I. 2003 . Reevaluating human gene annotation: A second-generation analysis of chromosome 22. Genome Res. 13 : 27 -36. ↵ Cross, S...
  7. ...for these genes has been difficult to determine using first- and second-generation sequencing technologies and/or molecular biological experiments like Southern blotting. Therefore, we used a curated BLASTN approach to quantify copy number for each of these sequences across our respective Nanopore assemblies...
  8. ...-wide annotation of HEK293T G4-CUT&Tag and G4 ChIP-seq peaks. G4-CUT&Tag detected more G4s at the promoter, gene body, and intergenic regions than the G4 ChIP-seq method. (F) Tracks example of G4 ChIP-seq, G4-CUT&Tag, Pol II (subunit: POLR2A), H3K27ac, H3K4me3, H3K4me2, H3K4me1 ChIP-seq, and chromatin...
  9. ...was determined as the average coverage depth of the scaffolds containing annotated ribosomal protein S3 (rpS3) genes. Abundances were normalized for comparison across samples by multiplying the average coverage depth by the sample read count and read length. (C) Normalized coverage of rpS3 containing scaffolds...
  10. ...their browser, is based on protein-coding genes from SWISS-PROT, TrEMBL, and TrEMBL-NEW and their corresponding mRNAs from GenBank. Transfrags overlapping with the set of Sanger annotated pseudogenes on Chromosome 22 ( Collins et al. 2003 ) were removed from our analyses because it is difficult to attribute...
For checked items

Preprint Server