Searching journal content for articles similar to Andrysik et al. 27 (10): 1645.

Displaying results 1-10 of 47
For checked items
  1. ...% specific to cells expressing WT TP53 and ∼22% specific to cells without WT TP53 (Fig. 1F). We found more TE-derived transcripts exclusive to KO TP53 cells than in WT TP53 cells, which supported TP53's suppressive role over TEs and was consistent with our previous study showing higher levels of TE...
  2. ...changes involved in development and tumor suppression.The TP53 family of transcription factors induces the expression of genes that determine the survival, proliferation, and differentiation of cells. In this family are three members: TP53, TP63, and TP73. TP53 has a well-known role in tumor suppression...
  3. ...associated with S5P RNA Pol II in irradiated samples (Fig. 1E). Pathway enrichment analyses of these up-regulated genes (Supplemental Fig. S2B) showed enrichment for TP53 signaling and cell cycle regulation, which are crucial for transcription of DDR genes and cell cycle arrest (Liu and Kulesz-Martin 2001...
  4. ....aerts@med.kuleuven.be Abstract Transcription factors regulate their target genes by binding to regulatory regions in the genome. Although the binding preferences of TP53 are known, it remains unclear what distinguishes functional enhancers from nonfunctional binding. In addition, the genome is scattered with recognition...
  5. ...that commonly deleted and amplified genes (e.g., TP53 and MYC) leave some transcriptional footprint unique to SCNA-, but not PM-, high tumors (Fig. 4). A recent study performed with fibroblasts suggests that these aberrations alone are insufficient to rescue the growthdefect experienced by aneuploid cells...
  6. ...to drive tumor development typically relies on specific expression dysregulation of tumor cells. While some of the alterations have been tied to perturbations of known oncogenes and tumor suppressors, such as MYC and TP53 (Sekiguchi et al. 2014; Glitza et al. 2015), the process by which many genetic...
  7. ...genes are associated with cell cycle control and the key regulatory factors RB1, E2F, and TP53 (Fig. 2I). Thus, in apparent contrast with the notion that the prominent effect of sumoylation on transcription is repression, we found here a positive correlation with promoter activity as well...
  8. ...once within a module, despite the number of mutations identified in it. Thus, modules containing a single frequently mutated gene (for example, TP53) would not be considered further because of the presence of a single highly mutated gene. Our goal was to identify networks containing multiple, though...
  9. ...Chr. 9:tel-24136507/Chr.13: 19558594–36717548 RFX3; GLIS3; JAK2; PSIP1; MTAP; BRCA2; SMAD9; SACS; TNFRSF19 SMAD9 3 3 6 Chr. 17:7122558–7868524 TP53; TNK1; NLGN2; ATP1B2; FGF11; SOX15 FGF11 1 1 7 Chr. 18:957962–12021803 RAB12; ARHGAP28; RALBP1; NAPG RALBP1 1 1 For each sample, an RQPS probe, consisting...
  10. ...correlate with the gene expression profiles of GC (Tan et al. 2011), as well as the activity and mutation status of frequently mutated genes such as CDH1 (previously known as E-cadherin), TP53, and ARID1A (Park et al. 2016; Luo et al. 2018; Xu et al. 2023). Among such classifications are the mesenchymal...
For checked items

Preprint Server