Targeted deletion of a 170-kb cluster of LINE-1 repeats and implications for regional control
- Miguel L. Soares1,2,5,
- Carol A. Edwards1,5,
- Frances L. Dearden1,
- Sacri R. Ferrón1,6,
- Scott Curran1,7,
- Jennifer A. Corish1,
- Rebecca C. Rancourt1,8,
- Sarah E. Allen1,9,
- Marika Charalambous1,10,
- Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith3,
- Willem Rens3,
- David J. Adams4 and
- Anne C. Ferguson-Smith1
- 1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom;
- 2Departamento de Biomedicina, Unidade de Biologia Experimental, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto; and i3S–Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal;
- 3Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, United Kingdom;
- 4Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom
-
↵5 These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract
Approximately half the mammalian genome is composed of repetitive sequences, and accumulating evidence suggests that some may have an impact on genome function. Here, we characterized a large array class of repeats of long-interspersed elements (LINE-1). Although widely distributed in mammals, locations of such arrays are species specific. Using targeted deletion, we asked whether a 170-kb LINE-1 array located at a mouse imprinted domain might function as a modulator of local transcriptional control. The LINE-1 array is lamina associated in differentiated ES cells consistent with its AT-richness, and although imprinting occurs both proximally and distally to the array, active LINE-1 transcripts within the tract are biallelically expressed. Upon deletion of the array, no perturbation of imprinting was observed, and abnormal phenotypes were not detected in maternal or paternal heterozygous or homozygous mutant mice. The array does not shield nonimprinted genes in the vicinity from local imprinting control. Reduced neural expression of protein-coding genes observed upon paternal transmission of the deletion is likely due to the removal of a brain-specific enhancer embedded within the LINE array. Our findings suggest that presence of a 170-kb LINE-1 array reflects the tolerance of the site for repeat insertion rather than an important genomic function in normal development.
Footnotes
-
[Supplemental material is available for this article.]
-
Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.221366.117.
-
Freely available online through the Genome Research Open Access option.
- Received February 4, 2017.
- Accepted January 10, 2018.
This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.











