Preservation of genetic and regulatory robustness in ancient gene duplicates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- Orla M. Keane1,2,8,
- Christina Toft3,4,8,
- Lorenzo Carretero-Paulet5,
- Gary W. Jones6 and
- Mario A. Fares1,7
- 1Department of Genetics, Smurfit Institute of Genetics, School of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland;
- 2Animal and Bioscience Department, Teagasc, Dunsany, County Meath, Ireland;
- 3Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain;
- 4Departamento de Biotecnologĺa, Instituto de Agroquĺmica y Tecnologĺa de los Alimentos (CSIC), Valencia, Spain;
- 5Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA;
- 6Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland;
- 7Integrative and Systems Biology Group, Department of Abiotic Stress, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (CSIC–UPV), 46022 Valencia, Spain
- Corresponding author: mfares{at}ibmcp.upv.es
-
↵8 These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract
Biological systems remain robust against certain genetic and environmental challenges. Robustness allows the exploration of ecological adaptations. It is unclear what factors contribute to increasing robustness. Gene duplication has been considered to increase genetic robustness through functional redundancy, accelerating the evolution of novel functions. However, recent findings have questioned the link between duplication and robustness. In particular, it remains elusive whether ancient duplicates still bear potential for innovation through preserved redundancy and robustness. Here we have investigated this question by evolving the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for 2200 generations under conditions allowing the accumulation of deleterious mutations, and we put mechanisms of mutational robustness to a test. S. cerevisiae declined in fitness along the evolution experiment, but this decline decelerated in later passages, suggesting functional compensation of mutated genes. We resequenced 28 genomes from experimentally evolved S. cerevisiae lines and found more mutations in duplicates—mainly small-scale duplicates—than in singletons. Genetically interacting duplicates evolved similarly and fixed more amino acid–replacing mutations than expected. Regulatory robustness of the duplicates was supported by a larger enrichment for mutations at the promoters of duplicates than at those of singletons. Analyses of yeast gene expression conditions showed a larger variation in the duplicates’ expression than that of singletons under a range of stress conditions, sparking the idea that regulatory robustness allowed a wider range of phenotypic responses to environmental stresses, hence faster adaptations. Our data support the persistence of genetic and regulatory robustness in ancient duplicates and its role in adaptations to stresses.
Footnotes
-
[Supplemental material is available for this article.]
-
Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.176792.114.
- Received April 3, 2014.
- Accepted August 20, 2014.
This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.











