Enhancer Transcripts Mark Active Estrogen Receptor Binding Sites

  1. W. Lee Kraus2,3
  1. 1 Cornell University;
  2. 2 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  1. * Corresponding author; email: lee.kraus{at}utsouthwestern.edu

Abstract

We have integrated and analyzed a large number of data sets from a variety of genomic assays (e.g., GRO-seq, ChIP-seq, DNase-seq, ChIA-PET) using a novel computational pipeline to provide a global view of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1; a.k.a. ERalpha) enhancers in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Using this approach, we have defined a class of primary transcripts (eRNAs) that are transcribed uni- or bidirectionally from estrogen receptor binding sites (ERBSs) with an average transcription unit length of ~3 to 5 kb. The majority are upregulated by short treatments with estradiol (i.e., 10, 25, or 40 min.) with kinetics that generally precede or match the induction of the target genes. The production of eRNAs at ERBSs is strongly correlated with the enrichment of a number of genomic features that have been shown to be associated with enhancers (e.g., H3K4me1, H3K27ac, EP300/CREBBP, RNA polymerase II, open chromatin architecture), as well as enhancer looping to target gene promoters. In the absence of eRNA production, strong enrichment of these features is not observed, even though ESR1 binding is evident. We find that flavopiridol, a CDK9 inhibitor that blocks transcription elongation, inhibits eRNA production, but does not affect other molecular indicators of enhancer activity (e.g., RNA pol II binding, H3K4me1 levels, enhancer looping). These results indicate that the assembly of enhancer complexes can be dissociated from eRNA production, suggesting that eRNA production occurs after the assembly of active enhancers. Finally, we show that an enhancer transcription "signature" based on GRO-seq data can be used for de novo enhancer prediction across cell types. Together, our studies shed new light on the activity of ESR1 at its enhancer sites and provide new insights about enhancer function in general.

  • Received November 19, 2012.
  • Accepted April 22, 2013.

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.

Articles citing this article

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Preprint Server