Compound Microsatellite Repeats: Practical and Theoretical Features

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Sample D18S58 data. D18S58 data for six samples, run on two different standard gels, are shown. Samples A,B, and C are control individuals, who do not carry variable-mobility alleles. (Sample A is CEPH control 1347-2). Both of the gels were scored as follows (in bp): A (149/149),B (151/149), and C (149/145). Samples13 are from individuals who carry one stable-mobility and one variable-mobility allele each. On gel 1, these samples were scored as follows (in bp): 1 (145/145),2 (153/153), and 3 (149/149). On gel 2, they were scored (in bp) as 1 (152/145), 2 (153/152), and3 (152/149). These three individuals were genotyped numerous times (see Table 1), and their D18S58 alleles were sequenced (see Table 2). Gel 1 shows an example of a case in which it is particularly likely that the variable-mobility allele simply did not amplify to a detectable level. Once on a standard gel (shown) and once on a formamide gel, sample 1 appeared homozygous for the 145 allele. The variable-mobility allele never appeared to be this small in samples 2 or 3, suggesting that, in this case, it simply did not amplify from sample 1. Whether the results for samples 2 and 3 on gel 1 are due to lack of detectable PCR of the variable-mobility allele or to comigration of the stable- and variable-mobility alleles cannot be determined.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 9: 830-838

Preprint Server