Table 2.
Comparison of EST Localization between RH Genebridge 4 Panel and YAC Contig
| ESTs mapped with RH Genebridge 4 panel | ||||
| Δlog10L = 0 | 0 < Δlog10L < 1 | 1 < Δlog10L < 2 | 2 < Δlog10L < 3 | |
| A. Interval (D14S259; D14S978) | ||||
| Assigned ESTs (RH) | 30 | 3 | 8 | 14 |
| Concordant mapping (RH/YAC contig) | 16 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Discordant mapping (RH/YAC contig) | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| RH mapping vs YAC contig undetermined | 0 | 1 | 4 | 11 |
| B. Interval (D14S978; D14S276) | ||||
| Assigned ESTs (RH) | 26 | 22 | 3 | 7 |
| Concordant mapping (RH/YAC contig) | 20 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Discordant mapping (RH/YAC contig) | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| RH mapping vs YAC contig undetermined | 6 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
-
Δlog10L = log10. Likelihood difference from the best location.
-
↵The position found on the YAC contig is identical to the most likely position obtained on the RH map.
