Multivariate Analysis of Factors Influencing Repeat Expansion Detection

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

The effects of various blotting and hybridization techniques on RED of DNA from cell line GM 10850 using a (CTG)10 oligonucleotide. (A) Electrotransfer, 2 A for 40 min in 1× TBE. Prehybridization and hybridization in Amersham Rapid Hybe for 30 min and 45 min, respectively. The membrane was washed for 20 min at room temperature and for 2 × 15 min at 60°C in 1× SSC, 0.1% SDS. Typical electroblotting artifacts are shown (arrows). (B) Wet capillary gel transfer. The completed gel was placed on top of a stack of wet filter papers, overlaid with a sheet of wet membrane, covered with another sheet of wet filter paper, then topped with a stack of dry filter sheets and a weight for 2 hr. (C) The DNA was transferred from the gel onto a membrane by dry capillary blotting. A wet (1× TBE) Hybond N+ membrane was placed on the gel, overlaid with three dry 3M papers and a weight for 2 hr. Following UV immobilization the membrane was prehybridized for 30 min and hybridized for 45 min at 60°C in CHURCH solution. Thereafter the same washing procedure were used as in A and B. (D) Dry capillary blotting as described above in C. Hybridization and washing conditions as in A and B.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 8: 1085-1094

Preprint Server