Minimizing reference bias with an imputed personalized reference

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Computational efficiency of personalization, indexing, alignment, and lifting across the evaluated workflows. (AC) Summarization of wall-clock runtime, peak memory usage, and CPU time for linear (BWA-MEM, Giraffe(linear)), pangenome (Giraffe(1 kGP_pangenome), Giraffe(HPRC_pangenome)), personalized-pangenome (Giraffe(diploid)), and impute-first strategies using either VG Giraffe (Giraffe(Imputefirst_c5), Giraffe(Imputefirst_c20)) or LevioSAM2 (Leviosam2(Imputefirst_c5), Leviosam2(Imputefirst_c20)). Bars are shaded to distinguish the types of computation. Note that only the workflow steps that depend on the input data are measured here. “Offline” index building steps that are input data independent are not counted. All workflows were executed using 32 threads, except for the BCFtools consensus and BWA-MEM indexing steps, which ran on a single thread.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 36: 740-753

Preprint Server