The paradox of R-loops: guardians of the genome or drivers of disease?

Table 1.

Comparison of some R-loop profiling methods

Method R-loop-recognizing entity Methodologies utilized Strand-specific Special considerations
DRIP S9.6 monoclonal antibody Immunoprecipitation No Batch to batch variation in S9.6 monoclonal antibody
bisDRIP S9.6 monoclonal antibody Immunoprecipitation, bisulfite conversion Yes Modified nucleotides must be detected in sequencing alignment
DRIPc S9.6 monoclonal antibody Immunoprecipitation, reverse transcription Yes May capture non-R-loop dsRNAs
DRIVE MBP-RHΔ Amylose resin enrichment No Limited sensitivity
R-ChIP RHΔ Immunoprecipitation Yes Requires generation of RHΔ-expressing cell line
MapR RHΔ–MNase fusion protein MNase cleavage of native chromatin No Requires generation of recombinant RHΔ–MNase fusion protein
BisMapR RHΔ–MNase fusion protein MNase cleavage of native chromatin, bisulfite conversion Yes Requires generation of recombinant RHΔ–MNase fusion protein

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 35: 1919-1928

Preprint Server