Timescale and genetic linkage explain the variable impact of defense systems on horizontal gene transfer

  1. Jaime Iranzo2,3
  1. 1Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), 28223, Madrid, Spain;
  2. 2Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, 28850, Madrid, Spain;
  3. 3Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), University of Zaragoza, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain
  • Corresponding author: jaime.iranzo{at}cab.inta-csic.es
  • Abstract

    Prokaryotes have evolved a wide repertoire of defense systems to prevent invasion by mobile genetic elements (MGEs). However, because MGEs are vehicles for the exchange of beneficial accessory genes, defense systems could consequently impede rapid adaptation in microbial populations. Here, we study how defense systems impact horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in the short term and long term. By combining comparative genomics and phylogeny-aware statistical methods, we quantify the association between the presence of seven widespread defense systems and the abundance of MGEs in the genomes of 196 bacterial and one archaeal species. We also calculate the differences in the rates of gene gain and loss between lineages that possess and lack each defense system. Our results show that the impact of defense systems on HGT is highly taxon and system dependent and, in most cases, not statistically significant. Timescale analysis reveals that defense systems must persist in a lineage for a relatively long time to exert an appreciable negative impact on HGT. In contrast, for shorter evolutionary timescales, frequent coacquisition of MGEs and defense systems results in a net positive association of the latter with HGT. Given the high turnover rates experienced by defense systems, we propose that the inhibitory effect of most defense systems on HGT is masked by their strong linkage with MGEs. These findings help explain the contradictory conclusions of previous research by pointing at mobility and within-host retention times as key factors that determine the impact of defense systems on genome plasticity.

    Footnotes

    • [Supplemental material is available for this article.]

    • Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at https://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.279300.124.

    • Freely available online through the Genome Research Open Access option.

    • Received March 8, 2024.
    • Accepted January 6, 2025.

    This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    | Table of Contents
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

    Preprint Server