Multicondition and multimodal temporal profile inference during mouse embryonic development

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Sex differences in mouse embryonic development. (A) Pairwise comparison of Sunbear prediction and the nearest neighbor baseline in recapitulating differential expression patterns in sex-matched time points. Each dot indicates the AUROC score of recapitulating female-/male-biased patterns in each sex-matched time point and cell type. (B) Similar to in A, pairwise comparison of Sunbear prediction and the nearest neighbor baseline in ranking escape genes to be more female-biased than all other genes on the X Chromosome. (C,D) Predicted temporal sex-biased log fold change in glutamatergic neurons and border-associated macrophages. Each line represents a gene that is predicted to be consistently higher in females than males and is colored by whether the gene is a known constitutive escape gene or not. (E) Distribution of predicted sex-biased scores of genes (0 = extremely male-biased, 1 = extremely female-biased), grouped and colored by whether the gene is upregulated (pink) or downregulated (blue) in Kdm6a KO versus WT samples in CD4+ cells. P-values are calculated by one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. (F) Gene Ontology biological processes enriched in consistently female- and male-biased genes in border-associated macrophages. Nonredundant terms with the smallest FDR are selected for visualization. No enrichment of biological processes is found in glutamatergic neurons.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 35: 2339-2351

Preprint Server