Table 2.
Calibration of the methods
| Method | Sample | BOLT-REML | GCTA-GREML | LDSC | SumHer-GCTA | SUM-RHE | RHE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bias | 10k | 0.0247 | 0.0219 | 0.0084 | 0.0095 | 0.0058 | 0.0047 |
| 50k | — | — | 0.0019 | 0.0005 | −0.0002 | −0.0002 | |
| SE | 10k | 0.0020 | 0.0020 | 0.0101 | 0.0031 | 0.0045 | 0.0045 |
| 50k | — | — | 0.0019 | 0.0006 | 0.0010 | 0.0010 | |
| FPR | 10k | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| 50k | — | — | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
-
We report the bias, SE, and the false-positive rate (FPR) of each method in the setting in which
. Because of computational limitations, GCTA-GREML and BOLT-REML were only run on 10k samples.











