Genetics-driven risk predictions leveraging the Mendelian randomization framework

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Assessment of disease risk prediction accuracy using simulated data. Comparison of model accuracy in recovering the simulated aggregate risk factor measured by Spearman's correlation coefficient. Compared are PRiMeR, its linear variant (PRiMeR-LIN), a predictor based on multivariable MR (MVMR-based), a predictor based on univariate MR (UVMR-based), and the supervised model accessing individual-level follow-up labels (LRM; Methods), varying the number of contributing risk factors (A), the fraction of outcome variance explained by the risk factors (B), and the fraction of outcome variance explained by horizontal pleiotropy (C). Stars denote standard values held constant while other parameters were varied. Error bars indicate standard errors across 10 replicate experiments.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 34: 1276-1285

Preprint Server