DNA-m6A calling and integrated long-read epigenetic and genetic analysis with fibertools

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Biological validation of the semisupervised m6A caller. (A) Description of biological samples used for validation of fibertools. (B) Percentage of methylated adenines called by fibertools relative to all adenines in a whole-genome-amplified (WGA) negative control as a function of the estimated precision reported by fibertools. This serves as an estimate of the false-positive rate. The red line marks the default threshold used by fibertools. (C) Percentage of m6A as determined by UHPLC–MS/MS (y-axis) and fibertools (x-axis) at the default precision level for WGA samples with varying levels of m6ATP spiked-in. The text (upper left) indicates the value of the Pearson correlation coefficient and the P-value from a two-sided t-test without adjustment for multiple comparisons. (D) Enrichment of m6A calls within targeted motifs of three motif-specific methyltransferases (Dam [purple], EcoRI [red], and TaqI [blue]) as a function of fibertools estimated precision. (E) Methylation percentage at recognition sites for Dam (purple), HsdM (orange), and other sites (green) among all sequencing reads of a plasmid grown in a dam+/hsdM+ Escherichia coli strain (top) compared with a dam/hsdM negative control (bottom). Dotted lines show the average across each category.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 34: 1976-1986

Preprint Server